Well you're assuming there would be some sort cabinet or national body, direct democracy operates on a small decentralized scale

There is no head or central leader

Alright, so like in comunities basically?

Anarchism?

You mean that?

Yeah pretty much, the Weimar Republic was still a representative democracy

Well

That's a bit tricky

At first an anarchist free territory might and just might be swallowed by another country

Considering there's nothing opposing it whatsoever and the region is isolated and doesn't trade anyways

Then there's the problem of organizing those communites to actually produce things efficiently for everyone to get their needs done

And when everyone gets a full say in that

Things get trickier

With hundreds of opinions on how to produce

Whenever to produce something at all

Or what to do with the produced things

It can work, yes

In fact there's a million worker cooperative here in spain, all of hem having a say

But they organize themselves into factions

And that slides into representatove democracy

Well direct democracy is really just rep democracy on a very small scale, you would see a ward of a hundred people or less electing a representative whom they can switch out at any time. Direct democracy would be more efficient since the lack of terms results in decisions being made faster than the bureaucracy found in modern rep democracies.

Direct democracy works but only in really small scales, that's the thing

What's the issue with it being on a small scale? A decentralized system would just function as a group of smaller systems working together. Which would solve issues faster rather than the bloated rep democracies we see today.

Well

That's optimistic

I do not trust a group of 100 people say all from the same region to solve their problems on their own and to manage themselves

They'll need diferent types of peoples with different types of skills to actually maybe sustain themselves

Let alone be able to actually even trade with other comunities

If that was the case you might aswell call the region independent

But not for long cause unless they have a good farmer personel they would all starve

And that's without counting how to deal with internal strife

External threats that would want to put down this territory that is neither protected and isn't trading with them

I don't see a reason for why people can't be educated in a direct democracy, they would actually be more educated since people could go back to post-secondary without the threat of debt. Defense could also be sorted out in this manner, not to mention the fact that every commune is protected since everyone has the access, ability, and education to use violence. Defence forces as seen in Rojava are organized in the principle of direct democracy and they have been able to hold out against Turkey.

Well

This "army"

You have 2 options

A decentralised army, everyone making their own moves

Basically easy picks for bigger armies that just need to defeat them individually

Or a centealised comand

But then you have a direct democracy over a lot of people

And thus hundreds of opinions and diferent aproaches