Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 587932586333175808
But not all
For example, equal rights before the law independent of wealth/status, sexuality, even gender
I am not a traditionalist
I don't think traditionalism exists
The only tradition in the world is chaos
Degeneracy
Agreed
And spontaneous cultural creativity
You're either purely an egalitarian or you're not
It's impossible to be an egalitarian and a capitalist.
We might understand the terms differently, or I misunderstand egalitarianism
"I'm an egalitarian, but equal rights before the law independent of wealth/status, sexuality, even gender"
All people are equal lol
This is just the Google definition
>deserve equal rights and *opportunities*
If that is the accepted and common definition, I would need to revoke my role
It's the most common
Karl Marx wasn't even an egalitarian
I'm not an egalitarian
egalitarianism is unhealthy for society
The capitalist role yuck
It may help to understand that egalitarian policy would be more efficient or workable in an ethnostate than in a multicultural society.
I understand that sounds highly contradictory
Paradoxical
I understand what you are trying to say
Egalitarianism is unhealthy though
There are men, there are women.
That fact alone makes pure egalitarianism impossible.
and egalitarianism is a black and white philosophical view
Everyone is different. That's what makes us unique.
Some people are naturally stronger, smarter, etc.
I embrace an impure or limited egalitarianism then
Just like a limited capitalism
Explain your capitalist view point
An ethnostate is a terrible idea
A diverse and mixed society would fix the cultural faults of culture
Low barriers to entry into the marketplace, relatively small taxes, little to no welfare state
For the purposes of wealth creation
Ideally spread across all income brackets