In terms of consolidation of power

I don't know enough about him to form an opinion of substance.

<#552589453202554891> James?

Ah thanks.

There we go

>egalitarianism
>capitalism
🤔

That doesn't make sense.

I can see the confusion.

I believe free markets are effective at creating wealth.
I support egalitarianism in many senses

But not all

For example, equal rights before the law independent of wealth/status, sexuality, even gender

I am not a traditionalist

I don't think traditionalism exists

The only tradition in the world is chaos

Degeneracy

Agreed

And spontaneous cultural creativity

You're either purely an egalitarian or you're not

It's impossible to be an egalitarian and a capitalist.

We might understand the terms differently, or I misunderstand egalitarianism

"I'm an egalitarian, but equal rights before the law independent of wealth/status, sexuality, even gender"

All people are equal lol

This is just the Google definition

>deserve equal rights and *opportunities*

If that is the accepted and common definition, I would need to revoke my role

It's the most common

Karl Marx wasn't even an egalitarian

I'm not an egalitarian

Most communists aren't even egalitarian

egalitarianism is unhealthy for society

The capitalist role yuck

It may help to understand that egalitarian policy would be more efficient or workable in an ethnostate than in a multicultural society.

I understand that sounds highly contradictory

Paradoxical

I understand what you are trying to say

Egalitarianism is unhealthy though

There are men, there are women.

That fact alone makes pure egalitarianism impossible.

and egalitarianism is a black and white philosophical view

Everyone is different. That's what makes us unique.