Message from @Deleted User

Discord ID: 587933361553801230


2019-06-11 09:13:04 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/578350904403689480/587932304874143744/unknown.png

2019-06-11 09:13:19 UTC  

All people are equal lol

2019-06-11 09:13:20 UTC  

This is just the Google definition

2019-06-11 09:13:34 UTC  

>deserve equal rights and *opportunities*

2019-06-11 09:13:36 UTC  

If that is the accepted and common definition, I would need to revoke my role

2019-06-11 09:13:47 UTC  

It's the most common

2019-06-11 09:14:00 UTC  

Karl Marx wasn't even an egalitarian

2019-06-11 09:14:04 UTC  

I'm not an egalitarian

2019-06-11 09:14:11 UTC  

Most communists aren't even egalitarian

2019-06-11 09:14:34 UTC  

egalitarianism is unhealthy for society

2019-06-11 09:15:13 UTC  

The capitalist role yuck

2019-06-11 09:15:45 UTC  

It may help to understand that egalitarian policy would be more efficient or workable in an ethnostate than in a multicultural society.

2019-06-11 09:15:50 UTC  

I understand that sounds highly contradictory

2019-06-11 09:15:52 UTC  

Paradoxical

2019-06-11 09:16:03 UTC  

I understand what you are trying to say

2019-06-11 09:16:10 UTC  

Egalitarianism is unhealthy though

2019-06-11 09:16:15 UTC  

There are men, there are women.

2019-06-11 09:16:33 UTC  

That fact alone makes pure egalitarianism impossible.

2019-06-11 09:16:46 UTC  

and egalitarianism is a black and white philosophical view

2019-06-11 09:16:56 UTC  

Everyone is different. That's what makes us unique.

2019-06-11 09:17:16 UTC  

Some people are naturally stronger, smarter, etc.

2019-06-11 09:19:34 UTC  

I embrace an impure or limited egalitarianism then

2019-06-11 09:19:39 UTC  

Just like a limited capitalism

2019-06-11 09:19:51 UTC  

Explain your capitalist view point

2019-06-11 09:20:59 UTC  

An ethnostate is a terrible idea

2019-06-11 09:21:24 UTC  

A diverse and mixed society would fix the cultural faults of culture

2019-06-11 09:22:47 UTC  

Low barriers to entry into the marketplace, relatively small taxes, little to no welfare state

2019-06-11 09:23:02 UTC  

For the purposes of wealth creation

2019-06-11 09:23:17 UTC  

Ideally spread across all income brackets

2019-06-11 09:24:21 UTC  

Not a big believer in intellectual property either

2019-06-11 09:24:36 UTC  

So you don't think there should be free education?

2019-06-11 09:25:18 UTC  

Public education is fine.

2019-06-11 09:25:30 UTC  

On principle I don't love it, but pragmatically I don't oppose it

2019-06-11 09:25:37 UTC  

I certainly oppose it's current form in the US

2019-06-11 09:25:42 UTC  

It's welfare

2019-06-11 09:25:56 UTC  

Do you think there should be free healthcare?

2019-06-11 09:26:06 UTC  

No

2019-06-11 09:26:09 UTC  

Why not?

2019-06-11 09:27:15 UTC  

Inefficient and inferior to a purely private market IMO

2019-06-11 09:27:27 UTC  

Purely private market would deliver the best services at the lowest prices I believe

2019-06-11 09:27:47 UTC  

Could be wrong though