<a:fortnut:527021327698231296>

@Monolith

cock?

@Monolith who are you?

@Cyborg Stfu "marx said commodity production doesnt exist under socialism" head ass

I remember you

Well clearly you didn't matter enough

also

>anarchist
Yeah like your opinion matters

but nice to re-meet you

>taking my roles as if they are not the logical conclusion to my actual ideology

ebin

by the way

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialist_mode_of_production

Am still correct

>wikipedia

<:leninbruh:585642157428178977>

>when it references his works

<:megahyperjoy:511213814554034196>

<:tfwbrainhole_Leah:585573711269330944>

<:polpot:558820158785978388>

He just responds with *hurr durr wiki*

>wiki

waiting for an argument, bye

The Marxist definition of socialism is an economic transition where the sole criterion for production is use-value

Argument made

disprove

Him calling it lower-phase communism means literally the same thing as Socialism

ahahah

Wikipedia

omg guys do you still believe that shit

Articles on wikipedia are made by a bunch of anonymous ppl and you cant even know their intentions

@Cyborg And uhh, you confuse something here

Under socialism its production and exchange, not production for exchange

```Under socialism its production and exchange, not production for exchange```
Dude, this IS what I said

Do you know what *commodity-production* is?

Commodity production is made to be exchanged

that is the entire concept

You can exchange things and not have commodity production.

Yeah, that wasn't the USSR, the USSR was production and exchange

Yeah, Marx goes on this SAME problem. organizing it doesn't make it not in profit use

Pick up a book and read into soviet economics, tl;dr my argument