Message from @louis_

Discord ID: 812108380537225217


2021-02-18 23:44:24 UTC  

Nice

2021-02-18 23:44:43 UTC  

hell ye, officer route is the way unless you want out in 4 years

2021-02-18 23:45:41 UTC  

There where a few tank buster in ww2...P-38, P-47 and the P-51 for <:AmericanFlag:720120797837918288>

2021-02-18 23:45:44 UTC  

This is a weapon

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/801170149855723540/812107614937939978/20210218_174500.jpg

2021-02-18 23:46:07 UTC  

the bun or the remote?

2021-02-18 23:46:12 UTC  

That's the same size as my boot

2021-02-18 23:46:26 UTC  

It's a squeaky hotdog

2021-02-18 23:46:35 UTC  

But he is the weapon

2021-02-18 23:46:41 UTC  

doggos are awesome

2021-02-18 23:46:48 UTC  

I remember having that kind of remote

2021-02-18 23:47:06 UTC  

God it feels weird seeing one of those in this day and age

2021-02-18 23:47:15 UTC  

who else is lowkey creeped out that all the new remotes have mics

2021-02-18 23:47:32 UTC  

My parents has one

2021-02-18 23:47:33 UTC  

If you've got bombs or missiles coming down on you, I doubt you're going to care if it's an old Cropduster biplane or a supersonic jet fighter, the explosives in those canisters work the same either way.

2021-02-18 23:47:35 UTC  

🙋‍♂️

2021-02-18 23:47:35 UTC  

Its weird

2021-02-18 23:48:08 UTC  

Just take away the propellers on the old planes and replace them with a jet engine

2021-02-18 23:48:13 UTC  

Most prop planes are used in the drug war in south America

2021-02-18 23:48:37 UTC  

That doesn't really work, the airframes can't take the increased stress.

2021-02-18 23:48:45 UTC  

Make them better

2021-02-18 23:48:46 UTC  

Duh

2021-02-18 23:48:46 UTC  

There usually armed to the teeth

2021-02-18 23:48:58 UTC  

yes, and let them rip themselves apart when they break the sound barrier <:KEK:795742276549607456>

2021-02-18 23:49:19 UTC  

Use the old blueprints but use better materials

2021-02-18 23:49:22 UTC  

ngl tho, most planes are surprisingly durable

2021-02-18 23:49:34 UTC  

Well, if that's the argument, then wouldn't it just be cheaper to manufacture a new plane?

2021-02-18 23:49:46 UTC  

No

2021-02-18 23:49:49 UTC  

Takes too long

2021-02-18 23:50:01 UTC  

Not really.

2021-02-18 23:50:25 UTC  

Assembly line takes less time than tearing apart an old plane and rebuilding it from the ground up.

2021-02-18 23:51:04 UTC  

eh, it depends to what extent your re-engineering them. R&D can cost billions on its own, so upgrading existing planes often works well. That's how we are able to fly our f16s and a10s thirty years in, b/c we upgrade the hell out of them to keep up with the times

2021-02-18 23:51:28 UTC  

It's the same reason why recycling isn't more of a thing here in the US. It's cheaper to dig the new materials out of the ground, takes less man-hours of work to do, and doesn't require any added infrustructure.

2021-02-18 23:51:47 UTC  

What if we took all of the best planes rn and just smashed them together

2021-02-18 23:51:57 UTC  

Ummm no

2021-02-18 23:51:58 UTC  

I wonder if I could fit a few lewis lmg or water cooled 1919s on my cessna 172 for ww1 larping

2021-02-18 23:52:31 UTC  

Congratulations, you are now using the exact logic of the Biafra Babies.

2021-02-18 23:52:44 UTC  

yes, but if your not recycling the entire plane, rather just improving its computer systems or updating its weaponry, you can save money but utilizing the original jet.

2021-02-18 23:53:00 UTC  

Also we're abit off topic

2021-02-18 23:53:06 UTC  

Yeah, but he talking about prop planes tho.

2021-02-18 23:53:25 UTC  

Several countries still fly proplanes

2021-02-18 23:53:33 UTC  

True.