Lab settings don't happen naturally. You can "prove" anything in a lab setting because you can manipulate it

also, it didnt happen spontaniously in a lab setting, someone started it

But evolution is something that couldn't have been controlled. You can make anything happen if you control it. I can control a rock by picking it up, but that doesn't mean it'll pick itself up.

If you come up with a new theory you have the burden of proof, thus newer theories have burden of proof.

It's random, meaning that lab settings don't mean anything or prove anything

he has a point tho...

I’m not arguing in bad faith, I have never pretended to believe your claims

Yes you’re right you still haven’t irrefutably proven your point. It still lies with you

Why would any of us refute out points?

if you could refute your point then its a flawed point isnt it?

It doesn't make any sense

of course

Again I’ve never pretended to entertain your notions

Why would I reword it. In the first 30 seconds of the video you sent you showed that atheism bears the burden of proof. It was atheists who first challenged the common belief so it is they that must provide irrefutable evidence for their views

Why would atheist's have to follow the burden of proof?

But there is no reason that the burden of proof applies. There's nothing to prove.

but your making a positive argument in favor of your negative

Because by default the state of people is to believe in a god or in God. If that is the default position then anything other than the default must provide irrefutable evidence for their view and so much of it that they over whelm the default to become the new default

but you then claim evolution

You say evolution exists

you must prove evolution

Ok and since everyone here believes that He does, the burden of proof is on you to irrefutably prove your point

that too

https://tenor.com/view/captain-america-avengers-endgame-old-man-i-dont-think-i-will-gif-14669627

im willing to engage

we have engaged you... i've been here for a log time being berated for not proving that god exists XD

Tu quoque

thank you 😃

cool thanks i'd love to continue our conversation

You keep deflecting when we engage you.

definitely interested

You’ve ignored me

Sad

I posted some videos and articles

I'll leave yall with this, this is my bottom line. I cant prove that God exists, but i like what 1st Peter 1 says. "Though you have not seen him, you love him; and even though you do not see him now, you believe in him and are filled with an inexpressible and glorious joy, for you are receiving the end result of your faith, the salvation of your souls." this is why we all believe what we do here.

There are a decent amount of times where it seems as though you became uncomfortable with a situation or displeased with it and so tried to deflect a criticism of your view onto the person making a criticism

That’s also a logical fallacy

Although if I’m being honest I don’t expect you to change your mind and I don’t believe you expect me to change mine