Strutting around like a chicken or peacock

Your entire argument consisted of one half-truth.

You weren't being respectful

You were lying through your teeth.

One half-truth? Remember, Peak Centrism was the key instigator

How was I lying

@Kriegs Commissar McCraw How was I or @Peak Centrism lying through our teeth? What half-lie were we perpetrating?

That Exodus 21: 20-21 showed that the bible was proslavery

When it didnt

So you through the entire argument out because of one word? The bible was proslavery, very clearly, on multiple occasions

When you use the context of the time as well as the chapter...

You once again speak half-truths

Your only argument can be that that was Shatel slavery which is equivalent to indentured servitude. But that is still abhorrent

Context of the time? So that justifies atrocities? During WW2 Germany, the Nazis thought Jews were inferior. That context doesn't justify their actions and the same principle applies to all contexts of slavery

Oh, so I was correct, you did miss my later argument, and said you won in spite of not seeing it.

sorry? what was that

oh

about him "perverting science"

laughable

You're misconstruing my argument.

how so

explain it to me

what don't I understand

Bloody heck, this Wi-Fi...

Freaking hate my schools wi-fi, I'll have to come back later

lmao I understand

its not really context of the time, but context of the word slavery, people are saying that slavery as said in the exodus verses means a Voluntary indentured servitude in where the 'master' is paying the 'slave' or servant in other translations. The problem here seems to be a lack of solid definition of the word slavery in that verse.

Not true. Indentured servitude is never voluntary and never right

I wouldn’t say that the Bible is pro slavery just because it has slavery in it, if anything, it’s anti-slavery, Jesus constantly identified with the poor, slaves, and sinners, also let’s not forget that Joseph is a man that is sold into slavery and ends up second only to the Pharaoh! That shows that through God you can do anything!

God would know what is ultimately moral, and if he says people won't be punished for owning and beating "their property" then that is equally abhorent

@Onespicyboi God says people who own indentured servants won't be punished unless they KILL THEM

this is wrong, people have many times in history worked for somebody else to recieve something in return out of their volentury choice to work for them

He only objects to his chosen people being enslaved

That's not what indentured servitude is

then how do you define it

Indentured servitude is involuntary labor, usually in regards to ancient POWs

i thought it was a contract where you say "hey im gonna work for you if you do this for me"

I want to see the receipts...

scroll up

Or damage the body of the slave. Nothing wrong punishing a slave but you can't damage the slave. Reread exodus 21

bruh

that's what I'm saying

Punishment or physical harm is not prohibited unless they don't recover in 3 days