Yeah, I hear you both.

The male is affirmed by being *worthy*, the female is affirmed by being *beautiful*.

Mr fusion, at least your in the truth now. But yes I think of all the wasted years.

Well my parents were closer than most, so I learned more at a younger age

Well, and the lack of philosophy taught has really undermined kids all over the christian sphere. Like, you can't tell an Atheist "This is what the Bible says" because their beginning assumption is that the bible is a bunch of bunk anyways, so why should they care what it says?

I don’t think most Atheist come to Private Catholic School, but that’s true. Atheists are for public school

Like, we really put ourselves in a bad place when we collectively believed that we didn't need to make a philosophical argument against the secularists taking over the Public Education system.

They don’t come in atheist, but they do leave atheist!

Truth

Well, and it's important to note that kids are going to have a rebellious stage. At some point, they *will* leave the nest, at some point they will stray from the rules taught to them. But the important thing they need to learn is how to watch.

If you can teach them to be cognizant and to observe what's happening in their lives, then they will learn. They will see "Ok, when I act in such a way, things really start going off the rails pretty fast."

And not all rebellion is bad, most of it comes from unexplored philosophical questions that teenagers tend to have. And you can't just hand them the answer, they need to experience the answers for themselves.

The Gospel is truly Revolutionary.

Mm yes. When they are little though, it would be wise to give them a fertile life lived with God and what that looks like. Parents should be an example. And that is also not happening for kids being thrown into private school. The parents think that means they are off the hook.

Btw, supertones, I was joking. I hope you understand.

I was making a joke on the word "Revolutionary" being usurped by communists.

Yeah I get it

But the question is what is someone rebelling against, and what is the foundation of what they believe.

as a christian we should be rebelling against the ways of this world, not violently though.

with a foundation of the Gospel

That's just my thoughts.

Well, personal accountability is no stranger to the discussion either, I might add. Like, you can have a few months of partying and being stupid, and if you're not done learning your lesson after that, then you're either oblivious as to what's happening in your life, or you've chosen that biblical teachings just aren't for you.

Because that kind of behavior does start having an effect on your morals and in consequence the effect on your morals tends to have an effect on your life.

fascinating and wonderful story
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ucdLlJi8j50

I feel like males want respect and female want love. From an emotional standpoint

Seems accurate

Yeah. Train up a child in the way he should go. And when he is old he will not depart from it. Proverbs

Yup.

This is true, people will often go back to what they learned very early in life, whether they intend to or not.

Yeah it's about building a strong foundation. Know the in and out so that doubt won't ruin a person's faith

Mm I will try to incorporate that.

When they go astray they will know where to come “home” to

both is good

@Kreia's Disciple men need honor as much as women need love.

Truth. I mean that’s why Zuko was trying to capture the Avatar

@Jaisea the Rapper one of the problems we're having in marriages these days is people don't know the difference between respect and honor.

HONOR. Reverence and respect given to some being, whether God or a creature, because of its recognized excellence. So, too, the reverence shown to anything because of its relation to a person who is honored.

RESPECT. Esteem for someone or something, arising out of special regard for that object because of his, her, or its excellence. More properly it refers to persons, and it refers to things only because of the persons with whom they are associated. It implies a deference to the one respected and to that extent a sense of inferiority in the one who has or shows respect.

I am also Romanian lol

But we know that James was Jesus’ actual brother as Paul refers to Him as such while not doing so for the other disciples. Furthermore there was an instance where Mary and Jesus’ sisters went to Jesus and confronted Him

I misspelled “many” LOL

Remember, there was no translation for cousin and such, only brother. We only know that John is Jesus’ cousin since Mary and Elizabeth are stated to be sisters. The old books could have used the same word for brother for John, but since Elizabeth is already established, we refer to him as a cousin

Under this case then Elizabeth could easily have been Mary’s cousin too