Message from @Semaj

Discord ID: 795461987848421386

2021-01-04 01:17:20 UTC  

i know but im saying

2021-01-04 01:17:26 UTC  

the gist of it is wealth right?

2021-01-04 01:17:39 UTC  

and how nations should acquire as much as possible?

2021-01-04 01:17:43 UTC  

Also u can make them work without consuming much, thats good, not bad

2021-01-04 01:18:06 UTC  

malnourished african hard labour hmmm

2021-01-04 01:18:10 UTC  

This is good, u consume what they dont

2021-01-04 01:18:22 UTC  

As if it were a bad thing

2021-01-04 01:18:40 UTC  

id say the purpose of forced labor more so is to dwindle down their numbers while making some use of them - it may not be profitable short term but if theyre eradicated long term you can move in your own people and develop it like that

2021-01-04 01:18:44 UTC  

@Punished Nazberg to make a slave the most profitable to work you need to feed, house, and aid a slave

2021-01-04 01:18:58 UTC  

How is it not profitable

2021-01-04 01:19:06 UTC  

im not saying it ISNT

2021-01-04 01:19:08 UTC  

its gonna cost more anyways unless the slaves are largely disposable

2021-01-04 01:19:10 UTC  

im sayign EVEN i we assume it is

2021-01-04 01:19:12 UTC  

I've already stated how easy/cheap that will be to do

2021-01-04 01:19:21 UTC  

He produces more

2021-01-04 01:19:32 UTC  

Ffs with this kind of thought the world is a deficit

2021-01-04 01:19:36 UTC  

It clearly is not

2021-01-04 01:19:44 UTC  

Or we would be living like monkeys

2021-01-04 01:21:20 UTC  

which is what made it widely inefficient lol, a slave also is much more unskilled, uneducated, and has less of an incentive to work. actual skilled workers are likely to produce much more and become much more efficient over time working for their own wage

2021-01-04 01:21:44 UTC  

he doesn't produce more because he'd be either too distressed or too physically incapable to do so

2021-01-04 01:21:56 UTC  

So ur people should do all the work yeah, bc work is fun 🙂

2021-01-04 01:22:17 UTC  

He consumes literally nothing

2021-01-04 01:22:26 UTC  


2021-01-04 01:22:29 UTC  

Some bread? Ragged clothes? A cage to sleep?

2021-01-04 01:22:46 UTC  

compared to a well fed, much more physically capable and well rested man

2021-01-04 01:23:14 UTC  

and when that slave dies you're guaranteed to need to replace it which obviously is costly unless you go for trashy slaves

2021-01-04 01:23:20 UTC  

Yes ofc its more efficient but its also a stressful job which u dont want to do

2021-01-04 01:23:59 UTC  

innovations negated the need for needing slaves to pick cotton

2021-01-04 01:24:13 UTC  

What about the jews in nazi germany

2021-01-04 01:24:41 UTC  

you're comparing a war economy to an agrarian economy,

2021-01-04 01:24:56 UTC  

jews in nazi germany were mostly geared to the war effort iirc

2021-01-04 01:24:57 UTC  

Wtf when did i mean agrarian economy

2021-01-04 01:25:00 UTC  


2021-01-04 01:25:01 UTC  


2021-01-04 01:25:09 UTC  

Dont over complicate it

2021-01-04 01:25:27 UTC  

i assumed since that was when it was the most profitable until technologies made it no longer favorable

2021-01-04 01:25:50 UTC  

an economy geared to war and an economy geared to wealth are two different things

2021-01-04 01:26:42 UTC  

Are you trying to argue that slavery wasn't profitable??? lmao

2021-01-04 01:27:11 UTC  

im saying that slavery isn't efficient in a modern scenario

2021-01-04 01:27:35 UTC  

it is profitable but its profitability was severed over time

2021-01-04 01:27:47 UTC  

Between genocide and slavery, slavery is the better option. It definitively is not a deficit