Message from @Erlik ᚯ
Discord ID: 809461695688474645
DO NOT believe them
Rurik is actually completely made up
The first leader of rus was actually guy named Rus or the Elder Rus
yet the russians told that he was their leader and invited him, curious
you are coping
Thats what ur Anglo “scienticists” and “historians” want you to believe
The Norman theory holds and is true
No it doesn't
Anti-Norman gang represent
Normans were protoslavs
It's scientific fact Slavs populated Denmark and South Sweden
were they culturally relevant until the 9th century
Absolutely
Copenhagen was called Čopanhák
why is thesis Slavs were settled in Scandinavia controversial when everyone knows Slavs had for example half of todays germany?
Ya
Germanic revisionism
scania is a quite different place slavic migration to eastern germany is a near place and connected by land
Also anthropological work from 1841 confirms that Rurik is mentioned in folklore and history of north east Germany but not as a German but as Slav
And term Rus being used only for Slavs
even we can be wrong
well if you belive veleti tribes had north germany it's not hard to belive there could be several migrations/raids into scandinavia
Normans are fake
it's not far away
Ya how convenient
Ok I got it Rurik was actually a hebrew named Ruriel
Ruriel Slavenstein
How convenient folklore of north Germany is wrong but Christian book written 200 after Rurik is somehow correct
I know right
Nothing
I am anti-Norman
Why
Normans were just french people that started larping as vikings
Ya
we talk here in regard to a theory of the origin of the name rus
Sus
Ya it's Slavic, even Chronicle of Bygone era confirms it
norman theory: it comes from a finno-ugric name of norse people coming from the name for paddle from old norse
East-slavic theory: it's a old polanic tribe that got named after the river Ros