you are gonna post a soyjak, aren't you?

any claim that rurik was anything but slavic is a germano judaic trick

DO NOT believe them

Rurik is actually completely made up

The first leader of rus was actually guy named Rus or the Elder Rus

yet the russians told that he was their leader and invited him, curious

you are coping

Thats what ur Anglo “scienticists” and “historians” want you to believe

The Norman theory holds and is true

No it doesn't

Anti-Norman gang represent

Normans were protoslavs

It's scientific fact Slavs populated Denmark and South Sweden

were they culturally relevant until the 9th century

Absolutely

Copenhagen was called Čopanhák

why is thesis Slavs were settled in Scandinavia controversial when everyone knows Slavs had for example half of todays germany?

Ya

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polabian_Slavs

Germanic revisionism

scania is a quite different place slavic migration to eastern germany is a near place and connected by land

Also anthropological work from 1841 confirms that Rurik is mentioned in folklore and history of north east Germany but not as a German but as Slav

And term Rus being used only for Slavs

even we can be wrong

well if you belive veleti tribes had north germany it's not hard to belive there could be several migrations/raids into scandinavia

Normans are fake

it's not far away

Ya how convenient

Ok I got it Rurik was actually a hebrew named Ruriel

Ruriel Slavenstein

How convenient folklore of north Germany is wrong but Christian book written 200 after Rurik is somehow correct

I know right

@Erlik ᚯ what do u know about normans being fake

Nothing

I am anti-Norman

Why

Normans were just french people that started larping as vikings

Ya

we talk here in regard to a theory of the origin of the name rus