Message from @ni co
Discord ID: 809857283437232148
that is law
you can of course disagree, but that's legal sense
Terrorist is a political label
Terrorism is firstly term from criminal code, then label
Unless you're King George you shouldnt be calling Washington a terrorist
*parliament
lmao
unless you are george bush dont call AQ terrorist
heil king george, he was pro america, but he was overpowered by evil advisors
What code are you talking about you're acting as if terrorism is a universal standard
yes
<:rusure:793674716987785256>
It's not
we have UN definition
which is basis for most of modern terrorism definitions
since it was defined mostly in 80s and 90s
A UN definition doesn't change anything
ok but go to the point
Even they are looking at it from their own subjective perspective
there is no terrorism definition not including american nationalists as terrorists
Let's say atomwaffen creates based American reich in the future
Would those future citizens then consider atomwaffen terrorists
I'll answer for you
No they won't
well of course
since terrorism is relative
but I call upon back then criminal code
How is a criminal code not also built off a subjective basis
All laws are interpretated and applied politically not from the vantage view of god in space
IP grabber
I liked Patrick
Sad state of affairs!
What did patrick casey do wrong
What's going on between him and fuentes
I default side with casey because he is white
Though I don't know anything about him
Other than he's a (white?) Nationalist
You have bad instincts