Message from @ni co
Discord ID: 809856683027071046
feels good to be freeman
if you are anglo and dont support atomwaffen then yall subhuman, can't deal with it
without a doubt
Vased
libtard mad
nooo you cant support terrorism.... terrorism is bad....
our great terrorist george washington said terrorism was bad....
Yeah compare atomwaffen to Washington
he was also a terrorist
Makes perfect sense
everyone taking up armed struggle against government is terrorist
that is law
you can of course disagree, but that's legal sense
Terrorist is a political label
Terrorism is firstly term from criminal code, then label
Unless you're King George you shouldnt be calling Washington a terrorist
*parliament
unless you are george bush dont call AQ terrorist
heil king george, he was pro america, but he was overpowered by evil advisors
What code are you talking about you're acting as if terrorism is a universal standard
yes
<:rusure:793674716987785256>
It's not
we have UN definition
which is basis for most of modern terrorism definitions
since it was defined mostly in 80s and 90s
A UN definition doesn't change anything
ok but go to the point
Even they are looking at it from their own subjective perspective
there is no terrorism definition not including american nationalists as terrorists
counter it
Let's say atomwaffen creates based American reich in the future
Would those future citizens then consider atomwaffen terrorists
I'll answer for you
No they won't
well of course
since terrorism is relative