@freeman he is also free man

without a doubt

Vased

libtard mad

nooo you cant support terrorism.... terrorism is bad....

our great terrorist george washington said terrorism was bad....

Yeah compare atomwaffen to Washington

he was also a terrorist

Makes perfect sense

everyone taking up armed struggle against government is terrorist

that is law

you can of course disagree, but that's legal sense

Terrorist is a political label

Terrorism is firstly term from criminal code, then label

Unless you're King George you shouldnt be calling Washington a terrorist

*parliament

lmao

unless you are george bush dont call AQ terrorist

heil king george, he was pro america, but he was overpowered by evil advisors

What code are you talking about you're acting as if terrorism is a universal standard

yes

<:rusure:793674716987785256>

It's not

we have UN definition

which is basis for most of modern terrorism definitions

since it was defined mostly in 80s and 90s

A UN definition doesn't change anything

ok but go to the point

Even they are looking at it from their own subjective perspective

there is no terrorism definition not including american nationalists as terrorists

counter it

Let's say atomwaffen creates based American reich in the future

Would those future citizens then consider atomwaffen terrorists

I'll answer for you

No they won't

well of course

since terrorism is relative

but I call upon back then criminal code

How is a criminal code not also built off a subjective basis

All laws are interpretated and applied politically not from the vantage view of god in space

IP grabber