this is not a government with millions of people

again, non-sequitur

didn't say it was

i dont think you need any kind of a collective owndership to have a functioning community. There are otherways to ensure the strength of a community, such as normal personal relationships

yeah it doesn't need to be codified into rule

because small communities already operate along strong communal ties

they're functionally socialst, without being explicitly politically socialist

ehh are they?

in what way?

yeah if your neighbor needs help raising a barn

@Orchid if you can interpret charity as "socialism"

you're going to help him

without asking for compensation

it's not even charity

it's just being neighborly

they also started when land could be bought for 5 bucks an acre...if i could buy land for that it wouldnt be a problem with needing to essentially crowdfund

ah alright

charity is a more accurate term for it than socialism

but we get what we mean

so it doesn't matter

if your friend has a sick kid and is struggling to pay for treatment, you're probably going to pitch in a few hundred, or even thousand

but charity has this connotation of helping "the lesser"

mmmh

in this case I wouldn't be giving my bro charity

yeah, kinda does

yeah thats the kind of community I can get behind

even if it's not strictly in the definitions

I would be just being a bro... the same bro he would be to me if I needed such help

and it's something that comes naturally to us as European homonids

yeah, set up the right context and agree to keep out harmful influences and it'll go fine

this is the same altruistic impulse socialists and jews (i repeat myself) exploit when pushing their agenda

because I want to help... but I only want to help people that understand and know that it's me helping them, and they know me.

I don't want to help the faceless herd get fat and then pay for their diabeetus medication

now, be fair
there are enslaved goyim socialists too )))

yeah, that works because at the end of the day we are still individuals and have clear property lines. But when you have communal ownership then people become more concerned that they are getting their share.

yes

yeah that's why communal ownership doesn't work

because it gives rise to disputes

"tragedy of the commons"

the incentive is to abuse the resource

but if the property is owned, you could arrange an economic trade with the owner, even if it isn't with money