Message from @Dread
Discord ID: 364126420730904588
What about Oregon? Too far south?
no oregon is fine
if you cant pay 20k per acre then why even bother
they clearly are, are you blind
Well the land needs water (lakes or rivers) and natural defense like hills or mountains
How about Winthrop WA. Its got big rivers and some nice hills and forests
look it up on google earth with terrain enabled
that lot is on a 40 degree slope
theres a reason its cheap
gov has all those national forests blocking the good land...
Winthrop wa is a good location
there isnt one
What if we pooled money and purchased a huge swath of land in one big bite then divide it later?
thats an option
it also has that huge fucking river going right through it
climate is a bit dry though
have you been there dread?
what exactly are you confused about dmac, I clearly explained to you the porblem with those locations
where in fl
north or south
middle but technically south on the east coast
why the fuck would we want to deal with a terrace?
dmac, the issue with developing shitty land, is that by the time you're done, you've invested more into it than good land would have cost
do i look like a chink to you?
What if we used pumps to drain water from the bottom terrace and pump it back up to the top so the water is flowing?
if i could turn 3000 an acre land into 20k an acre land for less than 17k... well
I agree with @dmac100 , we shouldnt be wasting cash on boxed in property
dmac if you have an idea that isnt retarded, feel free to share
look at that
oh i dont really care about where whatever is, im just saying, theres a reason undeveloped land stays undeveloped
6k per acre
I dont mean that property specifically but thats what I think we should be looking for, Big single properties to keep the community together
Ight check this one in Washington http://www.landwatch.com/Stevens-County-Washington-Land-for-sale/pid/25072934
3.3k per acre