yeah that’s probably the truest way to put it. i don’t think his very fine people comments were as loaded as people think but the fact that he even went as far to say that is telling. thanks @Scooter2000 that was a pretty wise response. particularism is a good way to put it. especially considering shit hole comment and things like that. he definitely sees race

your're welcome and thanks

real question, does anyone have any links to actual studies for "certain races inately more intelligent than others solely due to their race" please @ me

@clean Well you're never going to get that type of information

@Scooter2000 what hes saying is that the deliberate use of "we must secure" to start off a message, that is exactly 14 words long, on a topic that is crucial to the question of US demographics (immigration and border sec) is a pretty heavy dog whistle, if not a heavy wink and nod about where peoples loyalties actually lie.

i gathered that

@Scooter2000 why not?

i don't think it really tells us anything we don't already understand

@clean That's not a scientifically posed question and your not going to get a scientific answer for it.

ok do you have any links for me?

@clean Why don't you just look at any of the HBD stuff that Ryan Faulk talks about?

I think Trumps response to the 14 words would be "why not? What's wrong with that?"

It literally just says whypipo deserve a future

@NormanLord @Scooter2000 @BottomoftheNinth

who tf counts by 88’s

HH brother

i’m pretty shocked

@bress222 I think you cracked the code <:grug:420405237019443203>

that’s the same article by DHS @Scooter2000

https://forward.com/culture/404371/are-14-and-88-nazi-dog-whistles-in-this-homeland-security-document-or-just/

🤔

https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1013181655970873344?s=21

okay, this is epic

Step 1. close the bases

2. bring the boys home

3. save money

Hell yeah. End the occupation.

@bress222 I mean again like I said before. Does this mean that much? Not really, we know the explicit intentions of this administration and any hidden intentions don't seem out of line with those explicit intentions so this is kind of a...quaint and unfruitful pursuit. As long as you don't try to make something out of this that you shouldn't.

I'm really not getting why you are splitting hairs here. This is significant because it shows that there are more people out there than just trump. It shows that there are enough influential people at DHS not only to write this, but to get it approved as well. That doesnt mean that the DHS is making plans to round up anyone with a mexican name, but it is reassuring to realize that people in power stand behind the president, and behind some of the more controversial elements of his base.

@BottomoftheNinth I'm not splitting hairs I'm just shitting all over your parade

I dont think you are. I'm saying it's a good thing, but not anything to be over the moon about. Yet, you are acting like I am over the moon about it. I just consider it another big whitepill.

I don't think it's a whitepill at all it's at worst coincidental and at best trolly

https://www.axios.com/newsletters/axios-sneak-peek-abf8b627-9e9e-4ada-a83c-9a556b9c5f07.html?chunk=0&utm_term=twsocialshare#story0

The details: The bill, titled the "United States Fair and Reciprocal Tariff Act," would give Trump unilateral power to ignore the two most basic principles of the WTO and negotiate one-on-one with any country:

>The "Most Favored Nation" (MFN) principle that countries can't set different tariff rates for different countries outside of free trade agreements;

>The draft legislation is stunning. The bill essentially provides Trump a license to raise U.S. tariffs at will, without congressional consent and international rules be damned.

https://twitter.com/wiredsources/status/1013595478552965120?s=21

We could literally Noriega this guy

Sympathizing with drug dealers

Bring the troops home and station 100k at the border

Get Ready