The use of tribal makes it very clear that this was deliberate

14 words. starts with “we must secure”. to me, this is more than ‘haha someone’s shit posting’. it’s pretty deliberate. shit might be crazy in 4,5,6 years

What’s going on here?

@bress222 Are you trying to equate "secure the border" with the 14 words?

The title is 14 words long

not securing the border but the sentence structure of them both are oddly similar

1. we
2. must
3. secure
4. the
5. border
6. and
7. build
8. the
9. wall
10. to
11. make
12. america
13. safe
14. again

i mean

sure

i guess make of that what you will

1. we
2. must
3. secure
4. the
5. border | existence
6. and | of
7. build | our
8. the | people
9. wall | and
10. to | the
11. make | future
12. america | of
13. safe | white
14. again | children

that’s what i’m asking

Basically dotard blormpf is a nazi

should we make anything of it ?

idk it's funny

whatever intern wrote that probably knew what he was doing

it was either a complete accident or very deliberate. not just an intern shit posting

i can't say

if it's deliberate what should we take away from that?

anything significant?

Either way it set Christopher Mathias off so that's good

i’m not sure that’s why i ask

i would say not much

we know that people like Trump agree in essence with the 14 words (probably most of us here do) I don't really think any signaling towards it tells us anything we don't already know

like I'm not saying Trump would actually assent to a statement like the 14 words but in essence he would probably have to agree it's a good maxim

see idk though. that’s what i wonder. is trump in tune with that kind of thing? i think his “very fine people” comment was taken out of proportion to mean he was an apologist for neo nazi’s. what makes you think trump would implicitly endorse that @Scooter2000 ? not disagreeing just curious. id like to think so

if it sounds like i’m being a prick i’m not this is something that i continuously think about as to what trumps power level really is

he has explicitly assented to a number of particularist sentiments

like...?

like that book said he has a book of hitler quotes he reads every night. i doubt that’s true but idk

"We're going to make America great again!"
"We're gonna build a wall and Mexico is going to pay for it!"
"Not their best people.."

etc. etc.

Like he clearly believes in an American particularism. Like I said I don't think he would ever explicitly assent to the 14 words privately or publicly but I would find it very difficult for someone who is so passionate about preserving American identity and providing the impetus for a renaissance would be so tone deaf they don't realize there is a big demographic problem

and that's what the 14 words mean
there is a demographic problem
we have to preserve ourselves
and allow it to flourish

It's a pretty nice phrase it just carries a hell of a lot of baggage. Like the Roman salute, nice gesture but loaded.

yeah that’s probably the truest way to put it. i don’t think his very fine people comments were as loaded as people think but the fact that he even went as far to say that is telling. thanks @Scooter2000 that was a pretty wise response. particularism is a good way to put it. especially considering shit hole comment and things like that. he definitely sees race

your're welcome and thanks

real question, does anyone have any links to actual studies for "certain races inately more intelligent than others solely due to their race" please @ me

@clean Well you're never going to get that type of information

@Scooter2000 what hes saying is that the deliberate use of "we must secure" to start off a message, that is exactly 14 words long, on a topic that is crucial to the question of US demographics (immigration and border sec) is a pretty heavy dog whistle, if not a heavy wink and nod about where peoples loyalties actually lie.

i gathered that

@Scooter2000 why not?