Message from @Jimmy B. Ray
Discord ID: 462458429806608404
Obama wasn't able to pass shit after 2012 really
Why wouldn't he be able to pass anything by term two?
@Solipsistic Vinarchy BASED. No joke people say masonry dead but they still have a lot to with all the globalist shit. There was recently a lodge uncovered operating out of U.K. parliament. All the journalists collude with anti white MPs in this lodge, id assume this happens in others places-colluding to create media narratives, covering up crime etc
fellas let’s talk about whether this was purposeful all jokes aside
The use of tribal makes it very clear that this was deliberate
14 words. starts with “we must secure”. to me, this is more than ‘haha someone’s shit posting’. it’s pretty deliberate. shit might be crazy in 4,5,6 years
What’s going on here?
@bress222 Are you trying to equate "secure the border" with the 14 words?
The title is 14 words long
not securing the border but the sentence structure of them both are oddly similar
1. we
2. must
3. secure
4. the
5. border
6. and
7. build
8. the
9. wall
10. to
11. make
12. america
13. safe
14. again
i mean
sure
i guess make of that what you will
1. we
2. must
3. secure
4. the
5. border | existence
6. and | of
7. build | our
8. the | people
9. wall | and
10. to | the
11. make | future
12. america | of
13. safe | white
14. again | children
that’s what i’m asking
Basically dotard blormpf is a nazi
should we make anything of it ?
whatever intern wrote that probably knew what he was doing
it was either a complete accident or very deliberate. not just an intern shit posting
i can't say
if it's deliberate what should we take away from that?
anything significant?
Either way it set Christopher Mathias off so that's good
i’m not sure that’s why i ask
i would say not much
we know that people like Trump agree in essence with the 14 words (probably most of us here do) I don't really think any signaling towards it tells us anything we don't already know
like I'm not saying Trump would actually assent to a statement like the 14 words but in essence he would probably have to agree it's a good maxim
see idk though. that’s what i wonder. is trump in tune with that kind of thing? i think his “very fine people” comment was taken out of proportion to mean he was an apologist for neo nazi’s. what makes you think trump would implicitly endorse that @Scooter2000 ? not disagreeing just curious. id like to think so
if it sounds like i’m being a prick i’m not this is something that i continuously think about as to what trumps power level really is
he has explicitly assented to a number of particularist sentiments
like...?
like that book said he has a book of hitler quotes he reads every night. i doubt that’s true but idk
"We're going to make America great again!"
"We're gonna build a wall and Mexico is going to pay for it!"
"Not their best people.."
etc. etc.
Like he clearly believes in an American particularism. Like I said I don't think he would ever explicitly assent to the 14 words privately or publicly but I would find it very difficult for someone who is so passionate about preserving American identity and providing the impetus for a renaissance would be so tone deaf they don't realize there is a big demographic problem
and that's what the 14 words mean
there is a demographic problem
we have to preserve ourselves
and allow it to flourish
It's a pretty nice phrase it just carries a hell of a lot of baggage. Like the Roman salute, nice gesture but loaded.
yeah that’s probably the truest way to put it. i don’t think his very fine people comments were as loaded as people think but the fact that he even went as far to say that is telling. thanks @Scooter2000 that was a pretty wise response. particularism is a good way to put it. especially considering shit hole comment and things like that. he definitely sees race
your're welcome and thanks