itd explain buoyancy

but it would be a better explanation

than density and buoyancy

like why dont they question *why* denser things fall ?

^

i dont think their argument is about the existence of a force pulling them down its the nature of the force

i think they believe its the nature of reality for things to fall

all things fall, by law

but its just a band aid, and is just "accepted"

That's basically what Aristotle thought lul

You're not all9wed to say the moving up thing since thats flat earth society stiff

Stuff

Wot

Really

Ye ask a staff member

I think so atleadt

It's "controlled opposition"

Lul

which is dumb. a world accelerating upward would give them the best model of gravity possible

d

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u0zGRb1DmII

@SugarDaddy @bjhenderson1

@demonwarrior2266 the earth doesnt move

Stars never move

But what about buff Jesus

He's all that matters

@Bambino <#484515645258596369>

Nah it's a reference image

For my discussion

But I'll remove it if you want

Not sure what u r referencing

Long story

You dont have to remove it

All good

Demon, you can look at a star tonight and come back next year same day and time and the star will be in the same place

So saying accelerating upward is a good model for gravity, well that doesnt work.

Nor does the heliocentric model work

good evening citizen

@bjhenderson1 stop that

uwu

Sup in here

wassup