Message from @Vitmar
Discord ID: 642144437572730887
Its strikingly resembles the ISS
how small do you think a sattelite is, also sorry for the cut, pl continue
I think it looks more like a sattelite
sorry I am biased to like more sattelites than the ISS 😄
but indeed
it looks like
the problem is that it's too close to us
I believe thats a drawing found somewhere
it's indeed interesting
Even the ancient egyptians had a fish god. Those ancient civs all have similar resemblance.
ye
Looks like light rays coming off the bottom
religion is interesting
With solar pannel wings
Just like the ISS
Or what we believe to be the ISS
but couldn't the middle be the sattelite's body ?
Could be i dont know
Its funny tho
I've put some sattelites in orbit at Kerbal Space Program
it's very cool
it's funny
I should be better at making rovers than sattelites
yet my rovers usually break in the first minutes of their missions ;-;
I am a disgracee for mechatronics ;-;
...
@rivenator12113 was busy
You should weigh a heavy object in and out of a vacuum chamber and see how much the difference is then use that as a range of error and apply it to whatever results you are looking at
Then, since you will actually have evidence to support your argument, you may be able to make a valid point
Until then, it is simply a case of you saying the air pressure is significant, and others saying it is not
They don't assume the distance or size, trig is used to calculate the distance in the first place, and they don't use the size, they use angular size
Unless trig is fake
@lapizzle You tried to prove gravity but forgot to factor in that air density is a factor that affects weight and thus a failed experiment. You're going to ignore the normal scientific procedure just to own muh flat earth? That's like going in an experiment where you're trying to prove that water always boil at 100 degrees everywhere then you don't factor in that it wasn't done at different altitude with different air density in the environment.
You would get a C- even if you do everything else correctly but forgot that one little important factor and it would be labeled as a failed experiment.