True

Safer by 95% too

Hey oak, can you have a theory if the theory contradicts what you observe? @🎃Oakheart🎃

Good question

Like imagine taking a knife then dulling it to 95% of what it was and trying to cut with it

You'd need to dismiss the theory, test again multiple times, or modify your theory.

Or be ignorant.

Most choose the latter

It’s all just a hypothesis

Okay, then you just disproved the flat Earth and told me it should be dismissed.

Good job.

And hypothesis’s are changed a lot

Nope

@Atlas the Friendly Robot another one bites the dust

I've observed flat earth not curves

So dont try to trick me

Observational evidence is not enough for a theory @🎃Oakheart🎃

Nor is fake news

The problem is you don’t trust what they say the size of the world is

NASA isnt evidence

Tbh i have a really hard time getting behind flat earthing

Exactly you cant trust shit

Which makes it so hard

Let me ask you this. Does a 24 hour sun in Antarctica corellate with a flat Earth theory? @🎃Oakheart🎃

I was just like you guys once

U can trust the globe math is bs

I thought flat earthers were stupid

But then I realized the truth

Thats been proven time and time again

^

No globe

Can a 24 hour sun work on a flat Earth? @🎃Oakheart🎃

Oh

How big do you guys believe the world is?

I cant say poo poo

Only at the north polw

Pole

@Aba🥀 why?

It deletes it

Apologies, I am on my phone so typing is more difficult.