@RadRhys I believe Polaris is part of the Little Dipper, not the Big Dipper.

And math is valid. It’s empirically and verifiably true

And stars have not stayed in the same place.

They move every year, and we can calculate their movements with parallaxes

Also, how do you explain the Coriolis effect seen in hurricane storms in a flat earth model

You’re right, I always mix up major and minor

hey guys what do you make of this video, im kinda stumped now

https://youtu.be/edsUrLXrlLg

shows the curvature of earth and i can see it myself

anything that could explain this??

no fisheye lens

unless there was discreet manipulation of the video

Well, you have your answer then.

Manipulation.

but how do you know

we cant just jump to unreasonable conclusions

doesnt help us but i know manipulation and deception is all too common

It's unreasonable to assume that the video is true.

and you have no proof it's not a fish eye.

Curb your ignorance.

true but you should look at it yourself

Why?

I've seen hundreds of pictures of the globe.

It seldom gives me much thought.

its not a globe video

video footage of curvature at altitude

the only convincing thing ive seen against flat earth so far

Easily faked.

Very easily faked.

Have you ever seen the curvature with your own eyes?

I think not.

listen listen how many people can afford to fly up that high to do that? not a good argument, too many of us saying that and it doesnt help flat earth one bit

i need to hear what others think

Ok but thats not proof either.

The fact that you have to go to extreme lengths to see for yourself is enough reason for doubt.

There is simply no proof of a globe.

not exactly beyond reasonable doubt, i dont think you get im trying to just get a good explanation of the video's "proof" of curvature

this is a globe

lol

Ok how many times must I tell you, a video is *not* proof.

you didnt get what i was saying lol