Message from @negatic
Discord ID: 648278734906064896
and we wont notice
@negatic thats kind of what was going to be done in self driving cars
but the pre-requisite for that is human being coming to a conclusion on about what to do when faced with moral dillemma
but all of these aside, a literal human destorying AI is bit too far fetched
i never said a literal human would destroy ai
say that to john connor
XD
PLEASE
25th december 2019
THE EARTH
crap its agent smith
did you watch the video where someone trapped a selfdriving car?
no
i just want a tesla
yeah its all over the place
why not a ferrari
gas cars
plus tesla is more advanced
and is considered the worlds safest car and has much evidence to prove
but lets hope the ai wont ever work like feard and just like an extension for us like a calculator but instead we input some goal and it outputs whatever like a houseplan, a programm etc
you seem to imply that if AI was programmed with some goals like "human well being" etc it might kill us off
im saying thats bit impossible, @negatic
ferraris are faster and why would u need an ai to drive your car
i wanted to imply that if it WAS NOT then maybe
thats impossible too
why?
an ai specifically trained to perform music for example, will not automatically for whatever reason start to kill off humans, it was never programmed with the goal of "human well being" but that doesnt mean its going to do the opposite for the luls
i agreee with your example
but we are not at strong ai yet
u probably heard the paperclip example
or the one solving some math problem as goal
and killing humans off in the process
yeah ...its kinda a bad one
in those cases you simply gave the goa solve this problem or produce as many paperclips as possible
why is it bad?
the most realistic threats AI has currently is becoming a threat to a lot of jobs
that could lead to some big unemployement issues
agreed
old skool
anyway the examples remind me of an error in a programm causing an infite loop