or just talks to humans and makes them do whatever it wants

😁

I hate it when people use the wrong their like holy shit it's right their!

@Abe Lover head do er

Just use the correct they're

so, basically you're saying that it's unthinkable that AI can integrate disparate functionalities into a single all functioning entity

i mean that ai just needed to talk to humans giving it an extended way of interacting with the world and it could do anything @carlito

@Abe Lover they try correct you on bs and dont even understand punctuation grammar and context

and everyone signs up for it

its also interesting is there a pattern of words in some configuration that would basically make you do anything? @Satan

cus everyone else is

lol

no offense but all these philosophically examples of hypothetical ais are so far off from reality that it cant be taken seriously

we actually dont know if there far off or not

but its better to prepaire against the worst case

the so called management team in the department i was working for could hardly write a comprehensible sentence , let alone get their spelling and context grammar right @ElectroquasistaticMagnetoMan lol

after all there seems to be a great filter and we might not have it behind us

we wont get replaced by a.i ,we earn way more money ,machines etc ,factories ,perhaps yes ,but its us ,we,who make money not just in work ,but in living costs

daniel its almost certain that lots of jobs will get lost in the forseeable future to ai

its not as speculative as what we talk about

yeah a weird sentient blinky AI inside a box is very far off from reality

humans are more lucrative

(also if i make errors feel free to post em with a correction so i may improve my grammar)

well, the brackets aren't necessary for starters ^

noone said sentient or blinky 😉

jk

it is described that way

i dont think u need sentient

i remember doing an essay in french and i had one of the source say that more than 5 millions of the jobs in 2020 will be automated, it was so off lmao

I’m going to have an aneurysm

work out how much you earn and spend in a lifetime ,now multiply that by billions

Let’s just ditch grammar

.

what you say only makes sense in the context of humans are too expensive

@ElectroquasistaticMagnetoMan

humans make money

so?

that is one of the problems, these hypothetical scenarios take all the necessary technicalities and throw them out of the window
these are incredibly vague about the said AIs its just useless thought experiments of scenarios that will likely never exist

^ chances are so slim

okay Satan

if we knew today how we can build such an ai we would just do it