that's their decision

any black separatist movement would just be crushed by the rich whites

why?

rich whites should support it

i support it 110%

because they wouldn't want their territory annexed

there are areas where blacks are the majoirty already and it's their territory

but yah i get it

if they collect rent from the blacks or w/e

the white bourgeoisie would not let their territory and cities slip away

yeah

i'll conceed that to you guys

any example schuyler

@Fidel Castro the white bourgeoisie are the ones who support diversity

yep

they actually want more immigration

which hurts blacks more

because guess who the migrants compete with for work and living area

they support the import of cheap labor through immigration @RandomDiscordAccount

no black complains about that except the 3%

tulsa?

can you give me a link schuyler

i'm very interested in black nationalism

@Fidel Castro no, they support ethnic diversity in its totality and the logical conclusion of inclusivity

like they even support lgbt in countries that are predominately against it

thanks for that

leme check it

@RandomDiscordAccount give examples

sure, hold up

@Fidel Castro https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/01/why-so-many-businesses-support-lgbt-rights/
Supporting LGBT in India, a county predominately against it

well ima be off for a bit

later and have fun guys

bye dude

thanks for the good server and chats

@schuyler have you seen this

"Some African Americans who had been former slaves of the tribes, and subsequently integrated into tribal communities, acquired allotted land in Greenwood through the Dawes Act, a U.S. law that gave land to individual Native Americans. "

lol

lol

that reminds me did you know that there were Tribes who supported the South in the civil war