Message from @RandomDiscordAccount
Discord ID: 638622275704324097
they were the first agriculturalist with stone houses, ovens, bakeries, cities, water management and so on
both ancient egyptions and minoans greeks descend from the natufians @Fidel Castro
ok i concede i was wrong
theyre literally the ones who spread the afro-Asiatic language
basically all of north and east africa are natufian colonies
and much of south europe
but then how does this explain Native American civilization
aztecs
aztecs were trash but what about em?
inca were better in everyway
but why are you bringing 'em up?
they couldn't have been natufian
No one said all civilisation is natufian
Just all "African" civilisation
no one claimed they were but they are a northern Eurasian mix
yeah, exactly ^
They may as well have Independently arose because they had simmilar selective pressures applied to them
wouldn't the natufian genes be diluted so much not to matter after a certain point
even if supposedly they were so different
like let me be clear here
That's a pretty hefty claim
source?
all modern west eurasians descend from a few genetically cohesive groups who coloinized the majority of west Eurasia
lol sure literally look at the wiki link i already gave you
but sure, ill give you more
@Fidel Castro You don't have to deny orthogenesis to be a communalist you know
wait
if africans are descended from natufians then how can they be inferior or whatever?
@Fidel Castro not africans in total
north africans predominately
and east africans somewhat
@Fidel Castro its about selective pressure, thats what refines and defines the code
the original inhabitants of africa were black but were genetically replaced by agriculturalist who wiped em out
but the inhabitants of africa are still black
no, only those below the sahara desert
north africans are predominately eurasian ancestry
There's been a lot more migration as of late thanks to European technology
theyre closer to armaics and europeans then they are to sub saharan africans