yeah, exactly ^

They may as well have Independently arose because they had simmilar selective pressures applied to them

wouldn't the natufian genes be diluted so much not to matter after a certain point

even if supposedly they were so different

@Fidel Castro the majority of north african heritage is from the natufians

like let me be clear here

That's a pretty hefty claim

source?

all modern west eurasians descend from a few genetically cohesive groups who coloinized the majority of west Eurasia

lol sure literally look at the wiki link i already gave you

but sure, ill give you more

@Fidel Castro You don't have to deny orthogenesis to be a communalist you know

wait

if africans are descended from natufians then how can they be inferior or whatever?

@Fidel Castro not africans in total

north africans predominately

and east africans somewhat

@Fidel Castro its about selective pressure, thats what refines and defines the code

the original inhabitants of africa were black but were genetically replaced by agriculturalist who wiped em out

but the inhabitants of africa are still black

no, only those below the sahara desert

north africans are predominately eurasian ancestry

There's been a lot more migration as of late thanks to European technology

theyre closer to armaics and europeans then they are to sub saharan africans

dyno autobot

i said 'n1g3eria'

fucking hell

lol, dynobot removes the word "nigeria"

well what about n1g3ria

Epic

its sub saharan

@Fidel Castro yes

they arent natufians

theyre from the niger congo expansion that raped its way across africa

and they are doing pretty good rn

Relative to africa

yes with western aids, industry, reallocation of production and so on

it has overtaken south africa

eurobonds and what not

the largest economy in africa