thats like saying the Saudi's are better than the Japanese due to their oil supplies

they didnt create an economy, the camel nomads did

who do you think actually transported the goods from South to North?

it wasnt SSAs

it was berbers predominately

Who was setting up the mines?

who taught them to mine?

lol

probably sub saharan africans

what a happenstance that they suddenly learn how to produce iron when they come into contact with muslims

and that one of the products they traded for was produced iron goods

btw, another great people, the indo-european Hittites are the ones who originally producing iron from iron ore

the yamnaya and their descendants are amongst have had the largest impact on human history more so than any group probably

>and their descendants
basically everyone

what do you mean basically everyone?

East Asians arent from the Yamnaya at all and they have a huge population

well given ~2000 years of breeding basically everyone would have some kind of shared ancestry. For instance all Europeans are descended from Charlemagne

omfg i hate these stupid sayings that are propagated by articles that misuse scientific studies

no, thats not how ancestry works at all

how is it not true

culture and peoples alike of been completely erased before and we shouldnt except everyone to have ancestry from everyone

but charlemagne had so many descendants spread throughout europe that everyone can trace their ancestry back to him

because that claims isnt based on form of evidence based off of Adna but instead just mathematical stipulations

adna?

no one can trace ancestry back to him unless they have his Adna to compare to

Autosomal DNA

but surely the mathn is right

the fact of the matter is the study that the article you got that from is misusing the study

logically his ancestors would have spread through europe

Math isn't the whole picture

And I say that having math in my name

the study says the europeans have a strong genetic continuity and ancestry in relation to one another

Its an approximation when applied to biology

and since Charlemagne is a european who lived in the region

they claim you descend from charlemagne

i'm not arguing the exact thing that study did, I'm just saying all Europeans are descended from Charlemagne

like as if thats some how equal to someone who has direct heritage

no, not true

saying all Europeans are descended from Charlemagne is like saying that all of humanity descends from august

its just BS

its possible actually