Message from @RandomDiscordAccount

Discord ID: 638635602337726485


2019-10-29 06:57:19 UTC  

lol

2019-10-29 06:57:43 UTC  

probably sub saharan africans

2019-10-29 06:57:48 UTC  

what a happenstance that they suddenly learn how to produce iron when they come into contact with muslims

2019-10-29 06:58:13 UTC  

and that one of the products they traded for was produced iron goods

2019-10-29 07:02:08 UTC  

btw, another great people, the indo-european Hittites are the ones who originally producing iron from iron ore

2019-10-29 07:03:08 UTC  

the yamnaya and their descendants are amongst have had the largest impact on human history more so than any group probably

2019-10-29 07:04:42 UTC  

>and their descendants
basically everyone

2019-10-29 07:05:10 UTC  

what do you mean basically everyone?

2019-10-29 07:05:46 UTC  

East Asians arent from the Yamnaya at all and they have a huge population

2019-10-29 07:06:11 UTC  

well given ~2000 years of breeding basically everyone would have some kind of shared ancestry. For instance all Europeans are descended from Charlemagne

2019-10-29 07:06:47 UTC  

omfg i hate these stupid sayings that are propagated by articles that misuse scientific studies

2019-10-29 07:07:04 UTC  

no, thats not how ancestry works at all

2019-10-29 07:07:05 UTC  

how is it not true

2019-10-29 07:07:47 UTC  

culture and peoples alike of been completely erased before and we shouldnt except everyone to have ancestry from everyone

2019-10-29 07:08:25 UTC  

but charlemagne had so many descendants spread throughout europe that everyone can trace their ancestry back to him

2019-10-29 07:08:31 UTC  

because that claims isnt based on form of evidence based off of Adna but instead just mathematical stipulations

2019-10-29 07:09:20 UTC  

adna?

2019-10-29 07:09:22 UTC  

no one can trace ancestry back to him unless they have his Adna to compare to

2019-10-29 07:09:28 UTC  

Autosomal DNA

2019-10-29 07:09:39 UTC  

but surely the mathn is right

2019-10-29 07:09:52 UTC  

the fact of the matter is the study that the article you got that from is misusing the study

2019-10-29 07:09:56 UTC  

logically his ancestors would have spread through europe

2019-10-29 07:10:00 UTC  

Math isn't the whole picture

2019-10-29 07:10:10 UTC  

And I say that having math in my name

2019-10-29 07:10:16 UTC  

the study says the europeans have a strong genetic continuity and ancestry in relation to one another

2019-10-29 07:10:23 UTC  

Its an approximation when applied to biology

2019-10-29 07:10:39 UTC  

and since Charlemagne is a european who lived in the region

2019-10-29 07:10:48 UTC  

they claim you descend from charlemagne

2019-10-29 07:10:51 UTC  

i'm not arguing the exact thing that study did, I'm just saying all Europeans are descended from Charlemagne

2019-10-29 07:11:06 UTC  

like as if thats some how equal to someone who has direct heritage

2019-10-29 07:11:10 UTC  

no, not true

2019-10-29 07:11:58 UTC  

saying all Europeans are descended from Charlemagne is like saying that all of humanity descends from august

2019-10-29 07:12:04 UTC  

its just BS

2019-10-29 07:12:38 UTC  

its possible actually

2019-10-29 07:13:19 UTC  

that like 99% of people are descended from Augustus

2019-10-29 07:14:28 UTC  

even if there was somehow some genetic code that can directly be attributed to either of the two people, (which hasnt been proven in any ways) it would so small that it would be on par with our ancestry from ERVs

2019-10-29 07:14:40 UTC  

yes i know

2019-10-29 07:14:54 UTC  

but still true we descended from them

2019-10-29 07:14:58 UTC  

not saying its important

2019-10-29 07:15:30 UTC  

congratz all people descend from Augustus is the same way that all people descend from Endogenous retroviruss

2019-10-29 07:15:43 UTC  

Yes.