Message from @RandomDiscordAccount
Discord ID: 638632138618699796
there were lower down lords who owned parts surely
thats all of china my man
and unlike the indian and european feudal societies, the khanates were far more centralized and autocratic
this aint the holy roman empire were talking about
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongolian_nobility#Mongol_Empire_(1206%E2%80%931368)_and_Yuan_dynasty_(1271%E2%80%931368)
Others who owned Yuan China partially
@Fidel Castro dude, read your own post
the majority of those titles are prince
there are otehres
and the "kings of states" existed in the most southern regions and were technically owned by the emperor
a vassal is basically a slave
well regardless Mali Empire was still very rich
yes but not because of any advanced production, architecture or culture
its that they had easy to get at gold and salt
and a few central tribes basically sold that shit abroad
well surely if they were such savages they wouldn't be able to create an economy and civilization
thats like saying the Saudi's are better than the Japanese due to their oil supplies
they didnt create an economy, the camel nomads did
who do you think actually transported the goods from South to North?
it wasnt SSAs
Who was setting up the mines?
who taught them to mine?
lol
probably sub saharan africans
what a happenstance that they suddenly learn how to produce iron when they come into contact with muslims
and that one of the products they traded for was produced iron goods
btw, another great people, the indo-european Hittites are the ones who originally producing iron from iron ore
the yamnaya and their descendants are amongst have had the largest impact on human history more so than any group probably
>and their descendants
basically everyone
what do you mean basically everyone?
East Asians arent from the Yamnaya at all and they have a huge population
well given ~2000 years of breeding basically everyone would have some kind of shared ancestry. For instance all Europeans are descended from Charlemagne
omfg i hate these stupid sayings that are propagated by articles that misuse scientific studies
no, thats not how ancestry works at all
how is it not true
culture and peoples alike of been completely erased before and we shouldnt except everyone to have ancestry from everyone
but charlemagne had so many descendants spread throughout europe that everyone can trace their ancestry back to him
because that claims isnt based on form of evidence based off of Adna but instead just mathematical stipulations
adna?
no one can trace ancestry back to him unless they have his Adna to compare to