Message from @Fidel Castro
Discord ID: 639383019173707796
@Fidel Castro there's way too many to answer that quickly
its a defense mechanism to protect the greater tribe, not just the material condition on which it produces goods
One good example of part of white culture is monogamy
dude Marxism is inherently vehemently against class divide and "unjustified hierarchy" and by unjustified they mean 99% of hierarchies
Even Engels disagreed with the hierarchy of husband and wife ffs
no no its anarchists that are against 'unjustified hierarchies'
also marxists aren't always against marriage
marx himself had a wife
communism is a stateless, classless moneyless society
he also cheated on her with his maid that Engels then adopted bastard child
well the marxist definition of the state is somewhat different to what is generally meant
also whats this agbout cheating
bro, please
source?
literally just look "marx, maid child"
```On June 23, 1851 Helene Demuth gave birth to a boy, Henry Frederick Demuth, the birth certificate leaving the name of the father blank.[2] Most scholars accept that the child had been sired by Karl Marx,[3] a view that reflects surviving correspondence from the Marx family and their wider circle, as well as the fact that Marx's wife had been on a trip abroad nine months prior to the birth.[2]```
>most scholars accept
dont be a conspiracy tard
is there any actual proof though
i dont know, maybe the facts that who else fucked her and while engles would be trying so hard to pretend that isnt wasnt marx
but hell, there seems to be pretty popular that even Marx's wife slept around on him
` The child's paternity however remains a subject of discussion, with the academic Terrell Carver stating that, although it has been claimed since 1962 that Marx was the father, "this is not well founded on the documentary materials available", adding that "the gossip" is not supported by "direct evidence that bears unambiguously on this matter" `
we'll never know if he was or not
so in other words "they didnt have dna at the time so stop talking shit and making reasonable assumptions based on the body of evidence available."
its possible i suppose
doesn't make much difference
throws the whole Marx respected marriage thing out of the window
Marx was a deadbeat father and had to beg Engles for money so his daughter wouldnt complain so much about work
I don't really care about Marx's personal family relations
then dont bring it up and just accept the fact he was a degenerate and move on
>degenerate
a subjective view
the fact of the matter is that Engles, the second founding father of Marxism saw marriage as unjustified hierarchy
the thing about marxism is democratizing the means of production
why?
what earns someone to vote?
them being there of course
can you ask the question more clearly im not sure what you're trying to ask
its rhetorical question
basically im pointing out that Marxism is contingent upon a supposed end of economic and social development that leads to the goal of removing all barriers to entry for goods and services