Message from @Fidel Castro
Discord ID: 639384237220560896
bro, please
source?
literally just look "marx, maid child"
```On June 23, 1851 Helene Demuth gave birth to a boy, Henry Frederick Demuth, the birth certificate leaving the name of the father blank.[2] Most scholars accept that the child had been sired by Karl Marx,[3] a view that reflects surviving correspondence from the Marx family and their wider circle, as well as the fact that Marx's wife had been on a trip abroad nine months prior to the birth.[2]```
>most scholars accept
dont be a conspiracy tard
is there any actual proof though
that he was the father
i dont know, maybe the facts that who else fucked her and while engles would be trying so hard to pretend that isnt wasnt marx
but hell, there seems to be pretty popular that even Marx's wife slept around on him
` The child's paternity however remains a subject of discussion, with the academic Terrell Carver stating that, although it has been claimed since 1962 that Marx was the father, "this is not well founded on the documentary materials available", adding that "the gossip" is not supported by "direct evidence that bears unambiguously on this matter" `
we'll never know if he was or not
so in other words "they didnt have dna at the time so stop talking shit and making reasonable assumptions based on the body of evidence available."
its possible i suppose
doesn't make much difference
throws the whole Marx respected marriage thing out of the window
Marx was a deadbeat father and had to beg Engles for money so his daughter wouldnt complain so much about work
I don't really care about Marx's personal family relations
then dont bring it up and just accept the fact he was a degenerate and move on
the fact of the matter is that Engles, the second founding father of Marxism saw marriage as unjustified hierarchy
the thing about marxism is democratizing the means of production
why?
what earns someone to vote?
them being there of course
can you ask the question more clearly im not sure what you're trying to ask
its rhetorical question
basically im pointing out that Marxism is contingent upon a supposed end of economic and social development that leads to the goal of removing all barriers to entry for goods and services
thats always what it was and what it will be
well it is a lot of things
the destruction of all social responsibilities to have access to sustenance
Marxism is very broad
there are generally 3 parts of marxism:
im gonna go in 1 minute
economic
philosophical
political
his solution for an alternative to capitalism is trash
his end goal leads to nothing more than a behavior sink
what do you mean by behaviour sink
i have to go but summarized its basically that in a post scarcity society, mammalian animals lose sense over all social cohesion and hierarchy that leads to them acting out self destructive habits.