Message from @Fitzydog

Discord ID: 603964296417771553


2019-07-25 00:27:53 UTC  

just thought it was interesting

2019-07-25 00:39:13 UTC  

Seems interesting

2019-07-25 00:39:46 UTC  

But this ignores the social, religious and philosophical norms of the Era

2019-07-25 01:09:52 UTC  

That and environmental. Especially in the dark ages, but also standard middle ages. It was a fight for survival, so if someone promised protection that was one less thing the peasantry had to deal with.

2019-07-25 14:09:05 UTC  

well the era was 10th century ad

2019-07-25 14:09:23 UTC  

@Goblin_Slayer_Floki malnourishment is environment, no?

2019-07-25 14:09:51 UTC  

10th century wasn't all that known for its philosophy, mostly just being right at the end of the 'dark ages' for europe

2019-07-25 14:10:01 UTC  

beginning of feudalism basically

2019-07-25 14:26:46 UTC  

10th century was the best time to be alive

2019-07-25 14:26:51 UTC  

you had freedom

2019-07-25 14:26:55 UTC  

and clean air

2019-07-25 14:30:19 UTC  

and eight dead children by the time you reached middle age at 14

2019-07-25 14:33:43 UTC  

that is a small price to pay

2019-07-25 14:33:46 UTC  

for freedom

2019-07-25 14:57:17 UTC  

@desert hamster tenth century sucked, it was the beginning of feudalism, so feudalism was pretty bad - there was often too many obligations that the peasants paid their lord

2019-07-25 14:57:43 UTC  

Like people today don't have obligations

2019-07-25 14:57:45 UTC  

Lol

2019-07-25 14:58:01 UTC  

it only adjusted to leniency later - people were poorer because there was less trade from towns, towns hadn't growth to the size they would by 1300

2019-07-25 14:58:09 UTC  

I think people overestimate the suck of feudalism

2019-07-25 14:58:29 UTC  

Or attribute externalities to the political system

2019-07-25 14:58:37 UTC  

working for free doesn't suck?

2019-07-25 14:59:43 UTC  

They didn't work for free. They had all sorts of checks and balances to prevent abuse of the peasantry.

There's accounts of lords being 'sued' in a sense in the HRE

2019-07-25 15:00:23 UTC  

It's much more nuanced than you're led to believe

2019-07-25 15:00:41 UTC  

yeah there was less checks and balances in the 10th century id say

2019-07-25 15:00:57 UTC  

because that was the beginning of when kings grew powerful

2019-07-25 15:01:07 UTC  

Sure, but you got to eat, and you were defended from danger

2019-07-25 15:01:13 UTC  

before then, there wasn't even inheritance for monarchs - it wasn't assured, unless it was some big dynasty like carolingians

2019-07-25 15:01:36 UTC  

also slavery existed in huge numbers

2019-07-25 15:01:46 UTC  

and there were ay-rabs at dem borders

2019-07-25 15:01:49 UTC  

Yes, but not hereditary like in the US

2019-07-25 15:02:28 UTC  

what do you mean by that

2019-07-25 15:03:06 UTC  

Slavery in America? Blacks were slaves by default

2019-07-25 15:03:18 UTC  

Children of slaves were also slaves

2019-07-25 15:03:23 UTC  

no inheritance

2019-07-25 15:03:29 UTC  

?

2019-07-25 15:03:33 UTC  

Of what?

2019-07-25 15:03:36 UTC  

oh nvm

2019-07-25 15:03:46 UTC  

yeah slavery was hereditary i think in some contexts

2019-07-25 15:04:04 UTC  

Some?

2019-07-25 15:04:08 UTC  

Most