But anyways, these are normal Libertarians, I was mistaken.

The direct democracy thing thew me off

Admittedly when i said that i was looking at the middle-bottom part

Maybe it's cus our system right now essentially makes it so they would never get elected

But they would have to be elected to implement that

I mean if UKIP taught us anything it's that you don't need to get elected to popularize a policy

And it's not "your system" that won't get them elected.

Very complicated, but to sum up: They're of a heterodox opinion on the Progressive narrative

https://twitter.com/SamCoatesTimes/status/1113186925429575680

you know it's hit the fan when it's the DUP that are the only sane politicians with their stance on Brexit.

https://twitter.com/PoliticsSense/status/1113203613034319874

https://twitter.com/JonathanPieNews/status/1113039611381604352

LOLOLOLOLOL...
https://twitter.com/Independent/status/1113022216017412096

Not sure if this or comp sci is the best forum for this discussion, but I'm curious what arguments there are:
*Should there be rules on large scale social platforms (such as facebook, google, youtube etc) against algorithmic filter bubbles?*

My own stance is that filter bubbles are bad because it induces tribalism and misinformation. But I have no idea what the solution is.

I agree.

Ban all social media.

Solved.

it's marketing tech being used to feed a user's interests, which creates echo-chambers... they would have to disable recommended videos/posts to make any difference

I don't think filtering is the problem. The problem is that the user does not choose their filters. There are not enough hours in the day to consume every viewpoint. You simply have to impose a certain level of information hygiene to get through the day.

https://i.redd.it/9n1ziis95wp21.jpg

@Jas Use a different platform.

But the real question you're asking is, should social media platforms be manipulating their users unknowingly in the interest of marketing?

Key word there is >unknowingly

You should watch the Joe Rogan episode with the creator of Minds.com. Very informative

good idea

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mJowz_-pj4U

You can tell the guy is secretly a shitposter, but has to tone it down for Joe lol

https://i.redd.it/d2cm52ll2up21.png

that seems like some <:fake_news:430430057060630529>

Just ban all social media.

It's a blight. It's a mistake. It's a curse.

Its Sweden, king of the cucks

Don't forget the same shithole had "feminist snow removal"

that did not work out so well for them. let try reinvent the wheel by throwing away what we have learned of snow removal since we did invent cars and roads

Wheels? Look at this ableist bigot! Africa still hasn't invented the wheel so it must not be used as to not offend them!

good that as the snow removal is fucked up you cant use wheels so this is the only mode of transport that works in the winter snow

Whats this? Youre culturally appropriating the eskimos! REEEE!!!

@Warp Dukat eskimos didn't invent this shit lmao

Look at this racist, trying to steal achievement!
REEEE!!
http://magaimg.net/img/1cix.jpg

https://twitter.com/setheyboi/status/1112903778972270593

Peta somehow backtracking into the pro-life side of the abortion argument

I don't. Eggs are like hen abortion. You're eating abortion what could be more feminist than that?

I'm listening to the podcast you linked. I've always been for open source, but I really love when he compares it with having to declare what's in your food

Eggs are a hen ovulation