Message from @EnderOctanus

Discord ID: 567017714309136384


2019-04-14 15:36:09 UTC  

it's just a waste of space

2019-04-14 15:36:53 UTC  

waste of space, money and have a huge impact on the wild life where you put it up

2019-04-14 15:37:12 UTC  

i'd rather get more nuclear power plants

2019-04-14 15:37:18 UTC  

^

2019-04-14 15:37:31 UTC  

might as well just build lots of houses and cover them in solar panels

2019-04-14 15:38:16 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/372513679964635138/567010747763130418/1555256288134-1959441806.jpg

2019-04-14 15:38:32 UTC  

Those are semi trucks on a highway

2019-04-14 15:39:32 UTC  

you get so much more for your money when you go nuclear it silly, and with the progress we are doing on getting the most out of the fuel rods, nuclear waste is a decreasing problem. you get surprisingly little waste as long as you not trying to make fuel for nuclear bombs

2019-04-14 15:40:00 UTC  

just gib fusion <:pepe_sad:560202541904953365>

2019-04-14 15:40:15 UTC  

fusion gang

2019-04-14 15:40:36 UTC  

we are getting there, but the funds are so low it is going at a snail pace sadly

2019-04-14 15:40:51 UTC  

Andrew 'Fushion Boi' Yang

2019-04-14 15:40:58 UTC  

well i'm not surprised tbh

2019-04-14 15:41:03 UTC  

that fusion isn't getting much funding

2019-04-14 15:41:10 UTC  

it will probably kill the oil industry

2019-04-14 15:41:15 UTC  

if it becomes commercially viable

2019-04-14 15:41:17 UTC  

There's been some recent fusion advances

2019-04-14 15:41:30 UTC  

and then we won't be able to bring democracy to the middle east <:pepe_sad:560202541904953365>

2019-04-14 16:04:32 UTC  

<:NPC:500042735617703967>

2019-04-14 16:05:17 UTC  

The issue is it isnt stable, yet.

Also the nuclear. That's my exact arguement why I dont care about the sharing of nuclear power tech. Because 1 energy grade is far different from weapons grade.

2019-04-14 16:05:57 UTC  

We don't have fusion, stable or otherwise.

2019-04-14 16:07:09 UTC  

Iirc they did make a prototype for fusion but it only lasted for like 1 fusion, and stopped. The input was more than the output and it couldn't sustain fusion

2019-04-14 16:07:26 UTC  

No

2019-04-14 16:07:42 UTC  

I had an inorganic chemistry professor who would often joke about the incompetence of "scientists" in countries like North Korea, and their inability to develop tech needed to build nuclear weapons

2019-04-14 16:08:34 UTC  

especially taking into consideration the time spent on attempting to do so

2019-04-14 16:08:39 UTC  

i mean thermonuclear devices uses fusion for a part of the explosion so you could argue that we have unsustainable fusion haha

2019-04-14 16:09:07 UTC  

Other way around

2019-04-14 16:09:12 UTC  

@EnderOctanus Yes, we've reached positive energy with fusion in the last 6 months. Less than 20sec however.

They're going to try a new geometry though, by inverting the toroid

2019-04-14 16:09:26 UTC  

Ah lockeed martin patented a design for one and is building b

2019-04-14 16:10:48 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/372513679964635138/567018932213383181/Large_Helical_Device_mirrored_28272574128929.png

2019-04-14 16:12:03 UTC  

yeah we're sort of close to sustainable fusion power

2019-04-14 16:12:13 UTC  
2019-04-14 16:20:05 UTC  

i know we don't have fusion

2019-04-14 16:20:10 UTC  

*yet* <:pepe_smug:560207654207750154>

2019-04-14 16:20:13 UTC  

hopefully soon tho

2019-04-14 16:32:20 UTC  

if we did spend a little more money on fusion research and less on getting transporting africa to the west we be even closer

Build it in Africa <:makes_you_think:382980749780844554>

2019-04-14 17:03:40 UTC  

Okay

2019-04-14 17:03:41 UTC  

So

2019-04-14 17:03:44 UTC  

Windmills are big