Message from @Goblin_Slayer_Floki
Discord ID: 577208560434282496
And they arnt fighting for the other rights
There is a case for intelligence tests before being allowed to vote
well, we violate some of their rights on as as needed basis
but those violations serve a necessary purpose
No we blanket ban them from some
not letting them vote doesn't seem like it's necessary or conducive to any particular goal
You can have a financial or campaign felony and cant own a gun
It's a blanket ban. But like I said. While being punished you have even fewer rights. But I would be fine with restoring the vote post punishment. But to me that includes parole
Because to me parole is part of the overall punishment. It is just "you have been good so we are incentivizing that behavior and letting you out of full confinement to a lesser form"
PLS let BRIE LARSON ENDORSE KAMALA
@Broo TulsiGang 2024 π¬π§ πΊπΈ that list should have a picture of Clinton with a question mark
Apparently rumors of another Clinton bid are starting up again.
SOON
<:covfefe:440543908846632980>
I never understood putting up mayors...I get governors congresspeople, hell even promenenant business people. But mayors tend to have little or no houshold knowledge.
Raising profile, if you got money to spend
go do the test
Also, looks like I'm a progressive commie now <:GWcorbinTopKek:384871333705678868>
sup gay
not much, homo. you?
hey faggot @Fitzydog take test
I'm just doing som bio
<:thronk:441701565607444482>
I took the short one
authority is gay
no u
Authority will always exist.
The goal is to maintain an authority that respects the individual.
be more centraliized why do you
Why?
I'm saying you aren't federalize enough
Ahh
central government cuck <:pepe_smug:560207654207750154>