well ofc they won't do it

but in theory they could right?

in theory, absolutely

has that ever happened/

where they reversed a legislation very shortly after it was passed?

Not for something as fundamental as Brexit... normally such changes are thoroughly debated and tested first - but these cucks only care about short-term convenience rather than the fundamental earthquake they are creating to British stability.

----
I can't think of anything offhand that would have been reversed so quickly... more like after 100-150 years

oof

They are fucking with the system so hard that it is creaking with their bullshit

That said, Brexit itself is reversing the 46 year old decision to join the EEC in 1973...
...but obviously that's quite different than trying to reverse EU withdrawal some three years after Brexit was agreed via the referendum - especially as we haven't even left yet - so it's really anti-democratic to reverse EU Withdrawal Bill.

WRONG

we are not leaving the EEC

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Economic_Community#/media/File:Enlargement_of_the_European_Union_77.gif

Maastricht 🤢

CORRECT - we are leaving the institution that was the EEC
Maastricht proved the betrayal to those who read it (I did and that was what made me anti-EU in the first place)
Lisbon cemented the betrayal...

...Maastricht and Lisbon were amendments to the original EEC treaty... so they were two treaties where Parliament ignored normal procedures to get themselves secured on the gravy train.

- What effectively happened was that each treaty replaced the one before it. There would be no Maastricht or Lisbon without the original Treaty of Rome - so Brexit is fundamentally reversing the decision to join the European Union as known in 1973 i.e. the EEC.

When Broo becomes a euroskeptic because he is working in Greece. You know you fucked up 😄

https://twitter.com/HeftyLeftie/status/1107776383110078475

<:shap:497652686603288576>

https://www.autoblog.com/2019/03/18/uaw-vp-charged-corruption-investigation/

https://twitter.com/politico/status/1107646605073760256

HowAmISupposedToFeel.jpeg

<:super_edgy:426099058466095119>

I think that would be impeachable if they attempted that.

it's not

It's completely legal

I mean if that's something that the president can do, then just expand the Supreme Court every time someone enters office, so they can appoint a ton of new justices.

How about this? We'll allow you to have as many justices as possible, but they have to follow a set of principles relating to reciprocity, and can be impeached.

>Expand Supreme Court to 15.
>Add 6 new mega-liberal judges.
>Subvert our constitution completely.

Do it, faggots

No man, they won't add that extra shit.

It will still just be lifetime appointment with no restrictions.

That's why it should never happen.

they still need to get it past the senate, and that is going to be a hard sell

And it would be impeachable.

Oh, yeah, no. I was making a Propertarian meme

Grodd why are you still a greyfag? youve been here like a week?

Greyface.

https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/christchurch-shooting/111385517/website-operator-says-requests-for-help-in-wake-of-shooting-a-joke
Kiwi Farms blocked by one of NZ's biggest ISPs

I dunno @Holy Intersectional Inquisition I don't really give a shit about the colors and don't know how it changes over. Also I've actually been in the channel for months I just basically don't use Discord at all until recently.

so you're an oldfag?

Define oldfag