Message from @Deleted User

Discord ID: 571754812581085185


2019-04-27 17:45:44 UTC  

and back to erp again!

2019-04-27 17:45:47 UTC  

is there no escape?

2019-04-27 17:45:49 UTC  

That would be sadistic.

2019-04-27 17:46:25 UTC  

Well you can practise necrophilia on someone who is alive after you do one very important step.

2019-04-27 17:46:27 UTC  

@OpenCube cube-channn

2019-04-27 17:47:37 UTC  

meat is meat

2019-04-27 17:48:03 UTC  

Sadistic would be shoving their limbs through a meat grinder while they're still alive.

2019-04-27 17:48:11 UTC  

Its causing harm to the honor of the dead person

2019-04-27 17:48:17 UTC  

Or a wood chipper.

2019-04-27 17:48:21 UTC  

But that's not sadism Argus.

2019-04-27 17:48:31 UTC  

Hmm, true

2019-04-27 17:48:35 UTC  

It may be gruesome and disrespectful, but not sadism if they're dead.

2019-04-27 17:48:40 UTC  

respect the dead

2019-04-27 17:48:43 UTC  

It's *wrong*, but not sadistic

2019-04-27 17:48:47 UTC  

Sadism is staying in this server <:deadass:560215324167897128>

2019-04-27 17:48:51 UTC  

Depends on your morals.

2019-04-27 17:48:58 UTC  

I don't know if it's wrong.

2019-04-27 17:49:15 UTC  

Well no

2019-04-27 17:49:22 UTC  

Morality is sometimes objective

2019-04-27 17:49:29 UTC  

Nope.

2019-04-27 17:49:30 UTC  

Some things cannot be justified

2019-04-27 17:49:31 UTC  

Uh oh

2019-04-27 17:49:50 UTC  

Just because you can't imagine it because of your morals doesn't mean others don't disagree.

2019-04-27 17:49:50 UTC  

Without resorting to "my holy book says so"

2019-04-27 17:50:41 UTC  

You have no real argument to say it's immoral.

2019-04-27 17:50:49 UTC  

Everything you will argue goes to "muh feelings".

2019-04-27 17:51:13 UTC  

But what if it's self evident

2019-04-27 17:51:25 UTC  

No such thing.

2019-04-27 17:56:31 UTC  

I think there isn't necessarily a wrong being done to the person whose body it is (since they are dead) but it is potentially a wrong against anyone who cared for that person while they were alive. Additionally it might be a violation of the dead persons wishes regarding what will happen to their body after death. Finally i think the mutilator is committing a wrong against themselves by being so degenerate, i'm sure someone who mutilated bodies will become further detached from society and less capable of empathy.

2019-04-27 17:57:05 UTC  

true

2019-04-27 17:58:10 UTC  

human meat dont taste like anything anyways

2019-04-27 17:59:37 UTC  

You don't really have any good argument for why they should have any say to what happens to their body after death.

2019-04-27 18:02:26 UTC  

Whether the killer was being sadistic or gruesome seems a matter of the killers state of mind to me

2019-04-27 18:02:45 UTC  

Factually wrong. Sadism requires pain of the victim. There is no pain if they were dead.

2019-04-27 18:02:59 UTC  

That's part of the definition.

2019-04-27 18:04:21 UTC  

You know what i'm saying

2019-04-27 18:04:46 UTC  

Yes, and you're wrong. Maybe you don't know what you're saying.

2019-04-27 18:04:48 UTC  

Stop being autistic with everyone

2019-04-27 18:04:56 UTC  

Hmmm well its just about respect and the social fabric, I don't think people follow rules because someone is there to enforce them most of the time but because you respect rules with the expectation others will do likewise. Since this isn't based on enforcement i don't see why them being dead changes anything because other people will still witness whether you respect rules or not.

2019-04-27 18:05:06 UTC  

He's being factually autistic

2019-04-27 18:05:13 UTC  

Not really in the wrong