Is it sadistic if the victim is already dead?

Yes

How

I disagree. It only counts if they're alive. After death it's just meat.

Ye ^

its certainly not pleasant for any friends or family of the victim or anyone who has to witness it or clean up

It's still gruesome, but not sadistic.

But sadism is causing pain to someone else

I'm not saying it's not gruesome. But it's certainly not sadistic.

I think <:think_madpepe:378717098630971395>

i think it reflects poorly on someone's character to mutilate a dead body

Like you can't practise necrophilia on someone who is alive <:think_madpepe:378717098630971395>

Right. Sadistic would be cutting their throat so they don't die but can't make noise, and then cutting off each limb by steps while they're alive.

Waking them up frequently as they pass out.

and back to erp again!

is there no escape?

That would be sadistic.

Well you can practise necrophilia on someone who is alive after you do one very important step.

@OpenCube cube-channn

meat is meat

Sadistic would be shoving their limbs through a meat grinder while they're still alive.

Its causing harm to the honor of the dead person

Or a wood chipper.

But that's not sadism Argus.

Hmm, true

It may be gruesome and disrespectful, but not sadism if they're dead.

respect the dead

It's *wrong*, but not sadistic

Sadism is staying in this server <:deadass:560215324167897128>

Depends on your morals.

I don't know if it's wrong.

Well no

Morality is sometimes objective

Nope.

Some things cannot be justified

Uh oh

Just because you can't imagine it because of your morals doesn't mean others don't disagree.

Without resorting to "my holy book says so"

You have no real argument to say it's immoral.

Everything you will argue goes to "muh feelings".

But what if it's self evident