Nope.

Some things cannot be justified

Uh oh

Just because you can't imagine it because of your morals doesn't mean others don't disagree.

Without resorting to "my holy book says so"

You have no real argument to say it's immoral.

Everything you will argue goes to "muh feelings".

But what if it's self evident

No such thing.

I think there isn't necessarily a wrong being done to the person whose body it is (since they are dead) but it is potentially a wrong against anyone who cared for that person while they were alive. Additionally it might be a violation of the dead persons wishes regarding what will happen to their body after death. Finally i think the mutilator is committing a wrong against themselves by being so degenerate, i'm sure someone who mutilated bodies will become further detached from society and less capable of empathy.

true

human meat dont taste like anything anyways

You don't really have any good argument for why they should have any say to what happens to their body after death.

Whether the killer was being sadistic or gruesome seems a matter of the killers state of mind to me

Factually wrong. Sadism requires pain of the victim. There is no pain if they were dead.

That's part of the definition.

You know what i'm saying

Yes, and you're wrong. Maybe you don't know what you're saying.

Stop being autistic with everyone

Hmmm well its just about respect and the social fabric, I don't think people follow rules because someone is there to enforce them most of the time but because you respect rules with the expectation others will do likewise. Since this isn't based on enforcement i don't see why them being dead changes anything because other people will still witness whether you respect rules or not.

He's being factually autistic

Not really in the wrong

Basically we live in a society and if more people acknowledged that we might not be in such a clown world.

It's ok to be autistic.

Honk honk.

<:HonkHonk:566814473646768128>

WE LIVE IN A SOCIETY

its true

there is no escaping that

so yes it is wrong

You still have failed to give any genuine reason.

but it isn't sadism i agree there

lol fuck off explain if you want to argue don't just say no

I'm not the one claiming a moral stance.

I'm asking you to justify yours.

No he's being obtuse.For example, he knows when i said it depends on the killers state of mind, i meant the killer could have been intending to cause more harm to the victim though others can observe he's already dead.

Ok, delusion is a factor for intent. Sure. But that's only intent. The reality is different.

well i think i did explain, if you don't think that was a valid explanation you can expand on why

or i cba

So the killer might be sadistic but the act isn't sadistic.

Stfu and into <#372513679964635138>