the wild west

The frontier mentality lasted all the way up until thr 1950s, in Alaska at least

We did all see the buzz feed hit piece on Carl right?

New one?

no i didn't bother was it about anything new?

or same old same old?

The frontier went all the way from the original 13 colonies to the west coast.

All of the USA was the frontier at certain points in time.

It was the same old

The thing that got me though

It's like they are literally defending Nazis

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/prison-officer-had-sex-inmate-095549358.html

lol

meanwhile, in American prison...
https://uk.news.yahoo.com/killer-beheaded-inmate-removed-body-parts-prison-cell-111500444.html

Is it sadistic if the victim is already dead?

Yes

How

I disagree. It only counts if they're alive. After death it's just meat.

Ye ^

its certainly not pleasant for any friends or family of the victim or anyone who has to witness it or clean up

It's still gruesome, but not sadistic.

But sadism is causing pain to someone else

I'm not saying it's not gruesome. But it's certainly not sadistic.

I think <:think_madpepe:378717098630971395>

i think it reflects poorly on someone's character to mutilate a dead body

Like you can't practise necrophilia on someone who is alive <:think_madpepe:378717098630971395>

Right. Sadistic would be cutting their throat so they don't die but can't make noise, and then cutting off each limb by steps while they're alive.

Waking them up frequently as they pass out.

and back to erp again!

is there no escape?

That would be sadistic.

Well you can practise necrophilia on someone who is alive after you do one very important step.

@OpenCube cube-channn

meat is meat

Sadistic would be shoving their limbs through a meat grinder while they're still alive.

Its causing harm to the honor of the dead person

Or a wood chipper.

But that's not sadism Argus.

Hmm, true

It may be gruesome and disrespectful, but not sadism if they're dead.

respect the dead