Message from @gonejamin

Discord ID: 589166436966989825


2019-06-14 18:53:10 UTC  

Didnt trump get the price dropped some? Or was that the 16s or 17s?

2019-06-14 18:54:11 UTC  

most of the F22 contracts was way over priced for what they was delivering

2019-06-14 18:54:22 UTC  

Good old Theresa May and her crew of traitors got rid of perfectly good Harriers and replaced them with F-35 steaming piles of shit.

2019-06-14 18:54:35 UTC  

I mean it’s Theresa May

2019-06-14 18:54:41 UTC  

Do you expect her to be good?

2019-06-14 18:54:43 UTC  

F22... that's the one that can't fly in the rain?

2019-06-14 18:54:44 UTC  

<:trumped:440551399772913674>

2019-06-14 18:54:47 UTC  

Her hubby probably had a contract in it

2019-06-14 18:54:48 UTC  

They're finally 3d printing f22 parts in house, and saving thousands

2019-06-14 18:54:58 UTC  

@Jabba's Soapbox it can fly in the rain

2019-06-14 18:55:46 UTC  

Life sentences

2019-06-14 18:55:47 UTC  

There's one of the new "next gen" planes that can't fly in the rain because the stealth coating gets washed off

2019-06-14 18:55:57 UTC  

Lmao

2019-06-14 18:56:03 UTC  

Euro fighter?

2019-06-14 18:56:22 UTC  

it's one of the American superfighters, so I guessed the F22

2019-06-14 18:56:28 UTC  

are not the F22 vtol plane a broken proto type that cant fly with a weapon load and have to use a runway to take off, last I did see

2019-06-14 18:56:38 UTC  

@Nordhand nope, 35

2019-06-14 18:56:40 UTC  

Never heard of that with a us fighter

2019-06-14 18:56:48 UTC  

@gonejamin imagine being so narcissistic

2019-06-14 18:57:04 UTC  

Why imagine when you can just be ?

2019-06-14 18:57:09 UTC  

Nigga just dry the paint

2019-06-14 18:57:24 UTC  

Yeah I don't think it's a US plane.

2019-06-14 18:57:42 UTC  

The airlines can do it so you can to!

2019-06-14 18:57:50 UTC  

35s and 22s both live in Alaska, and it'd be useless to house them there if they couldnt operate in the rain

2019-06-14 18:58:04 UTC  

They might look cool, but they got no room for a decent gas tank...
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/introducing-1-problem-f-22-and-f-35-cant-seem-shake-37127

2019-06-14 18:58:30 UTC  

it the F35 that dont like getting wet

2019-06-14 18:58:34 UTC  

The F-35 us good change my mind

2019-06-14 18:58:53 UTC  

@Jabba's Soapbox They're not supposed to have range, they're supposed to protect an area

2019-06-14 18:58:54 UTC  

Maybe a prototype that never saw general use

2019-06-14 19:00:04 UTC  

The planes were never meant to be long range

2019-06-14 19:00:19 UTC  

Fighter jets can do what's called 'hot pit refueling' where the plan lands, taxis, and gets refueled without turning off the engine

F-22 is for America only

No F-22 for you British Peasants

2019-06-14 19:01:05 UTC  

22 has more top secret stuff than the 35

as you know USA. EVERYTHING is on the table in a deal

2019-06-14 19:01:45 UTC  

The whole range issue is as follows... destroy the supply chain and they're useless

2019-06-14 19:02:00 UTC  

Try us

Capture Iran ASAP