Message from @Fitzydog
Discord ID: 634612549941329951
Same rate of fire
And british light infantry had rifles
Just not the main line infantry
It's not the same
Light infantry did not have rifles..
They had buck and ball muskets
A ball drops straight down with a musket, while with rifles its tight
So ramming the round takes a bit longer
It's tight in both tard
Alot tighter with the rifle
I've shot muskets
I own a muzzleloader
A rifleman can load and fire 3 shots a minute
Same
Learn your shit
The Prussians could 4<:pepe_smug:560207654207750154>
You've probably never shot a flintlock
Brown bess muskets were 3 RPM
IF you were a highly experienced rifleman
Rifling has existed since the 1500s btw
But did the british infantry adopt it? 🤔
In the 1770s at least
<:pepe_eyes:378719408362881024>
Muh person who isnt talking out his poop slot
The minie ball was what made rifling worthwhile
And was when rifled muzzleloaders became common infantry guns, and not just for skirmishers/light infantry
I've always found it easier loading in a smooth bore vs. Rifled muzzleloaders...btw
Also rifling was expensive until machining got good enough
The reason the brits did not have rifles, is because they were more difficult to manufacture in bulk, and had to be issued uniformly.
Americans prided their guns like they do trucks these days. They were a status symbol that were heavily invested in and custom made to order
In the early mid 1800s
Well...we both basically said the same thing
Industry and minie balls made rifles finally practical
Btw...Armies in the world in 1775 in order
1.Prussia
2. France
3. Russia
4. Austria
5. Britian
<:pepe_smug:560207654207750154>
According to whom? 😡
I dont see the russian empire conquering 73% of the earth's surface
What would "The sun never sets on the russian empire" be?
Think it could fit on a seal? I dont
That has nothing to do with army strength
That was mostly about naval supremacy
Against the other europeans
The colonization part was never done by a large army