Message from @Ruggwain
Discord ID: 427904282663190529
I will say this.
If you guys @radeon @Deleted User think that because you have guns you will never be dominated or never will live under a tyrannical government, you guys already have the mindset to live under a tyrannical government
sure, *now* you do, but what about in 50 years?
for changes to the constitution there needs to be a 3/4ths majority
mma fighter is kinda right actually
no one said that @Fulcrum010
in 50 years the same pillars will be in place or we will have unelected Merkel
@Deleted User
Radeon said that
oh ok
we are not free because we have guns we have guns because we are free. You are not free.
i didnt
CDU and SPD are hemorhaging seats in both federal and state government positions
And we go back to the same point....
if your freedoms can be taken from you effortlessly you don't have them. they are meaningless words on paper.
Our government isn't Merkel
there's hundreds of people
i was using merkel as an example
who have to act consciously and conspiratorially
for even the remotest erosion to our systems to happen
The only loophole of oppression they have is the EU
my point is you have no idea what might happen in the future, which is the point of having a citizenry-backed constitution.
and their actions in the EU
are causing them to lose support
hence why the AFD has become the second strongest party
i'll give you a more plausible example, its 2040, greece decides to cecede from the EU and the EU army invades. what now?
we unelect whatever party approved this and put an anti EU party in power
lol
this austism is
or we continue to elect the party that thought it was a good idea because we thought it was a good idea
its fairly obvious that a totally armed people are impossible to oppress without killing everyone which would defeat the purpose of occupying a territory.
other than resources
India and all the colonies got their independence just fine without toting guns
because it was given to them, dumbass.
That is because Britain isn't a dictatorship
I just find this idea of voting away the tyranny to absurd
Britain isn't a dictatorship yes
@Ϻ14ᛟ it wasn't , now I'm not so sure
but it didn't exactly get given to themn
there was nothing stopping the british from continuing to oppress the indians, they stopped for diplomatic reasons.
You know Gandhi said if it were any other nation in control of India they would have already put a bullet in his head for rallying against him
But British people were not like that, despite occupying the land