See, you're like those retarded atheists that's ready to vomit stupidities because you heard it from an atheist echo chamber.

your king james bible confirms it?

Catholics don't use King James.

See, more stupidity.

Well thanks for enlightening everyone.

🤷

Enoch is full of contradictions with the Bible.

There's absolutely no reason to believe it's legit.

Not the first time fake scriptures were found.

It even contradicts the Talmud.

Canon texts were not decided on a whim.

Hmm

What i learned from arthurian lore/writings is that people from all times love to write fan fiction

🤔🤔🤔

Do it then

My Wife believed that Cows are the Personification of Mother Nature. Do you think for one second I didn't marry her because of that.

What's the chance of the history of Jesus being the history of a simple man that was exaggerated for the sake of creating a myth?

There's a chance, yes. Then there's a whole lot of weird things surrounded such a simple man that you'd need to explain away.

Like, why did a Jew that went around persecuting, arresting and executing Christians, suddenly converted to Christianity (after Jesus died nonetheless, never have met Jesus "alive") and willingly accepted torture and death under the Romans for not rejecting Christ.

Because scientology

how does it confirm the book are unchanged

you pointed out catholicism

are you saying the catholic book has never been changed?

and if so how has this been confirmed

I didn't say it was unchanged.

Another thing you might want to read up on before you try this again.

so when i asked for confirmation you hurled a few insults and mentioned catholicism

you havent actually said why they are confirmed

73 books in the catholic bible

so you accept they have been changed and yet still say they are confirmed?

The texts were changed, and we know how much and when.

Ok well you still havent shown how they are confirmed to be true

do all original 73 manuscripts exist today?

I like to think the bible and any old why its customs are the way they are. Gay sex is wrong cuz it prolly meant diseases from torn asses with fecal matter.

There were multiple manuscripts. Once you start finding them in multiple places of the world, across centuries, you can start to figure out what the source (where they were copied from) actually said.

I truly think you are trying to fix something you don't understand and you should just leave it alone

Also, the apostles themselves built churches around africa, asia, europe, with traditions that were coherent with the scriptures, before the scriptures existed.

I know you won't

but that would be my advice to you

In fact, finding the common texts between the big 5 early christian centers was one of the principles for selecting the canon.

you know how they say you cant judge a book by its cover, but at the moment, you pretty much always can. Its like, things have gotten so tribal in a lot of places that people will tend to identify themselves more easily by appearance. So you literally can