Message from @Fitzydog
Discord ID: 430543787849154570
I didn't say you legally had to use the right to your advantage, but people do it nonetheless
Rights are abstract yes
In the strictest sense, rights are arbitrary and not concrete, but the point of their existence is to set hard borders as to what the state can and cannot legislate on
we can skip the whole 'Where do muh rights come from?" nonsense though. dumb question lol
@radeon that poses a problem - sometimes a religion instructs you to do things that would violate the law (e.g. FGM)
classical liberals base rights on the moral principles of natural law
But you can create rights for anything in reality
THIS
right not to be offensive
offended even
THIS DEBATE STUFF IS WHAT THIS DISCORD IS FOR
Now you're blurring the difinition of 'right'
Yes it does, another reason to stop religions influence on culture. Nevertheless FGM is clearly a violation of a person's human rights which Trump's any right to religion
well the definition is abstract and can be applied in many ways, and is applied in many ways
Human rights are always first before legal ones
Trump
WHAT THE
lmao
BRAIN COMON
Like can you explain to me the right to education?
what does that mean?
idk, educate me
You don't have a right to education, that's stupid
i agree that you don't but in law we do
LMFAO
accurate, not shopped
Things granted to you by the state are privleges.
@someone think of the children
I'll gladly debate on gay rights if you like
but legally they are classed as rights
that's why i also agree with you that they are abstract, or there are multiple definitions to what rights are
Well, @NightOwl , we're all aware of the cesspit pf politics in the western world. So that hardly matters.
fags can be fags as long as they don't try to peg me
done