it is basically that

freedom to religion is a right. That doesnt legally require you to do it

Freedom of religion is a part of freedom of expression.

A right is something abstract that you are willing to defend.

I didn't say you legally had to use the right to your advantage, but people do it nonetheless

Rights are abstract yes

In the strictest sense, rights are arbitrary and not concrete, but the point of their existence is to set hard borders as to what the state can and cannot legislate on

we can skip the whole 'Where do muh rights come from?" nonsense though. dumb question lol

@radeon that poses a problem - sometimes a religion instructs you to do things that would violate the law (e.g. FGM)

classical liberals base rights on the moral principles of natural law

But you can create rights for anything in reality

THIS

right not to be offensive

offended even

THIS DEBATE STUFF IS WHAT THIS DISCORD IS FOR

Now you're blurring the difinition of 'right'

Yes it does, another reason to stop religions influence on culture. Nevertheless FGM is clearly a violation of a person's human rights which Trump's any right to religion

well the definition is abstract and can be applied in many ways, and is applied in many ways

Human rights are always first before legal ones

Trump

@radeon not making a cake for a fag should be allowed tho

WHAT THE

lmao

BRAIN COMON

Condolesa Rice. See? I can do it too. @Werlf

Like can you explain to me the right to education?

what does that mean?

idk, educate me

@Fitzydog ?

You don't have a right to education, that's stupid

@redd I'm a gay furry so

i agree that you don't but in law we do

@radeon wut r rights

LMFAO

accurate, not shopped

Things granted to you by the state are privleges.

@someone think of the children

I'll gladly debate on gay rights if you like

@radeon sure

@Fitzydog i agree and i've said the same things before

but legally they are classed as rights