Message from @redd

Discord ID: 430549425857757185


2018-04-03 02:06:15 UTC  

I'm a gender realist but that doesn't mean I would deny people the ability to have a family simply because it's not in an ideal situation.

2018-04-03 02:06:39 UTC  

but they dont have a right to a family if they cant produce their own children

2018-04-03 02:06:45 UTC  

@radeon You make it seem like there AREN'T other, better family situations for these kids

2018-04-03 02:06:47 UTC  

Nobody answered my question, which is preferable, gay parents or no parents?

2018-04-03 02:07:19 UTC  

As it is we have far more foster kids than we do married gay couples

2018-04-03 02:07:21 UTC  

what do you guys think of those degenerates who got `U` put on their child's birth cert.? This is lgbt bollocks to the extreme

2018-04-03 02:07:26 UTC  

@Deleted User ... so infertile women shouldnt be able to adopt?

2018-04-03 02:07:33 UTC  

@radeon And why is that? Go look it up.

2018-04-03 02:07:44 UTC  

The adoption system in the US is rigged as hell

2018-04-03 02:07:54 UTC  

Yea

2018-04-03 02:07:54 UTC  

@NightOwl she should be able to if she is with a man who will stay with her for the next 15-20 years

2018-04-03 02:08:11 UTC  

they can, but they dont have a right to it like free speech

2018-04-03 02:08:22 UTC  

That seems awfully arbitrarily @redd

2018-04-03 02:08:57 UTC  

It's arbitrary to require that the adoptive family be a solid one?

2018-04-03 02:08:58 UTC  

Also why do you think you or anyone else should have the ability to decide who gets to have a family or not?

2018-04-03 02:09:06 UTC  

@radeon oh yes, it is not a practical law because you can't prove that a couple will stay together, but it is a system you could use prediction with

2018-04-03 02:09:09 UTC  

adoption is for the child, not because "I wanna be a mommy, I demand a baby"

2018-04-03 02:09:24 UTC  

gimme a child <:pedobear:371557062850904064>

2018-04-03 02:09:36 UTC  

Sure but would you rather a kid go to two middle class gay men or to two hetero junkies?

2018-04-03 02:09:37 UTC  

I was gonna say they already deny people children 🤔

2018-04-03 02:09:42 UTC  

yeah

2018-04-03 02:09:54 UTC  

It is not a right

2018-04-03 02:09:56 UTC  

Nice talkin guys, I'm out of this utter cancer

2018-04-03 02:10:00 UTC  

those questions are just silly radeon

2018-04-03 02:10:04 UTC  

@Deleted User They deny good people the ability to adopt

2018-04-03 02:10:20 UTC  

No it isn't a right however I don't see a liberal argument for denying it to gay people.

2018-04-03 02:10:28 UTC  

Who tagged me as mittens? Go fuck yourself

2018-04-03 02:10:43 UTC  

On mobile so I cant see it

2018-04-03 02:10:48 UTC  

fps mittens reporting in

2018-04-03 02:10:59 UTC  

@radeon lol I dropped Liberalism months ago. Pragmatism is taking over.

2018-04-03 02:11:08 UTC  

@Werlf
There is how to look reactions on mobile

2018-04-03 02:11:14 UTC  

I've not seen any studies that suggest there are developmental issues in kids raised by gay parents

2018-04-03 02:11:14 UTC  

I see

2018-04-03 02:11:20 UTC  

of course you go with the least damaging, but the choice you are putting out there has little to do with actual circumstances. like I said there are plenty of straight couples on a list to adopt. @radeon

2018-04-03 02:11:24 UTC  
2018-04-03 02:11:26 UTC  

Many homosexual parents have surrogacies.

2018-04-03 02:11:27 UTC  

@radeon Who wrote those studies?

2018-04-03 02:11:36 UTC  

it's not just about adoption

2018-04-03 02:11:44 UTC  

@Werlf <:Szechuan_Stalin:379099505607573534>

2018-04-03 02:11:51 UTC  

Yeah

2018-04-03 02:11:57 UTC  

why can't we burn the faggots on a stake?